BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37246973)

  • 1. Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ichikawa S; Sirlin CB; Cunha GM; Wolfson T; Fowler KJ; Morisaka H; Onohara K; Shimizu T; Omiya Y; Sugiyama H; Okumura A; Onishi H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Aug; 48(8):2557-2569. PubMed ID: 37246973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Xie S; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jiang T; Liu W; Rong D; Sun L; Zhang L; He B; Wang J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Feb; 47(2):596-607. PubMed ID: 34773467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications.
    Catania R; Chupetlovska K; Borhani AA; Maheshwari E; Furlan A
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Dec; 46(12):5723-5734. PubMed ID: 34519877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates.
    Oh NE; Choi SH; Kim S; Lee H; Jang HJ; Byun JH; Won HJ; Shin YM
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):465-474. PubMed ID: 37532900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal lexicon of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma modified from LI-RADS.
    Hwang SH; Park S; Han K; Choi JY; Park YN; Park MS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Sep; 44(9):3078-3088. PubMed ID: 31165907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Wang JY; Feng SY; Yi AJ; Zhu D; Xu JW; Li J; Cui XW; Dietrich CF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 May; 46(5):1216-1223. PubMed ID: 32115307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI as an additional major imaging feature for HCC classification using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.
    Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Chen J; Zhang L; Rong D; Kuang S; He B; Wang J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7715-7724. PubMed ID: 33782766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LI-RADS Version 2018 Targetoid Appearances on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance for the Differentiation of HCC and Non-HCC Malignancy.
    Min JH; Lee MW; Park HS; Lee DH; Park HJ; Lee JE; Park SJ; Kim SS; Park SH; Ha SY; Hwang JA; Cha DI; Park B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):421-432. PubMed ID: 35319906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Chen J; Kuang S; Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Zhang L; Rong D; He B; Deng Y; Xiao Y; Shi W; Fowler K; Wang J; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1530-1542. PubMed ID: 33040166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Ehman EC; Behr SC; Umetsu SE; Fidelman N; Yeh BM; Ferrell LD; Hope TA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 27193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chen N; Motosugi U; Morisaka H; Ichikawa S; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Matsuda M; Fujii H; Onishi H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016; 15(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 26104079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold growth has a limited role in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other focal hepatic lesions.
    Lyu R; Wang D; Hu W; Gao Z; Yu C; Wang J; Li M; Jia K
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):201. PubMed ID: 38049717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancies in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.
    Shao S; Liang Y; Kuang S; Chen J; Shan Q; Yang H; Zhang Y; Wang B; J Fowler K; Wang J; B Sirlin C
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 20(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 31999940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018.
    Lee SM; Lee JM; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Yang HK; Yoon JH
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 22(7):1066-1076. PubMed ID: 33739633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
    Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of the origin of tumor in vein: comparison between CEUS LI-RADS v2017 and v2016 for patients at high risk.
    Tong WJ; Cheng MQ; Lin MX; Hu HT; Pan JM; Huang H; Wang Y; Xie XY; Lu MD; Kuang M; Huang Y; Wang W
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Oct; 22(1):186. PubMed ID: 36309665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Training in LI-RADS Version 2018 Improve Readers' Agreement with the Expert Consensus and Inter-reader Agreement in MRI Interpretation?
    Zhang N; Xu H; Ren AH; Zhang Q; Yang DW; Ba T; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 33963801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.
    Ludwig DR; Fraum TJ; Cannella R; Ballard DH; Tsai R; Naeem M; LeBlanc M; Salter A; Tsung A; Shetty AS; Borhani AA; Furlan A; Fowler KJ
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2116-2132. PubMed ID: 30798397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.