These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37247089)

  • 1. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study.
    Lin H; Pan Y; Wei X; Wang Y; Yu H; Cheng H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records.
    Li J; Chen Z; Decker AM; Wang HL; Joda T; Mendonca G; Lepidi L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans.
    Inoue N; Scialabba R; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans.
    Yang S; Dong B; Zhang Q; Li J; Yuan Q; Yue L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator.
    Park JH; Lee GH; Moon DN; Kim JC; Park M; Lee KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):849-853. PubMed ID: 32624222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Novel Technique to Align the Intraoral Scans to the Virtual Articulator and Set the Patient-Specific Sagittal Condylar Inclination.
    Yang S; Feng N; Li D; Wu Y; Yue L; Yuan Q
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 34170604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Zeitler JM; Martin J
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow.
    Kim SJ; Kang YJ; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37957064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique.
    Kim JE; Kim SJ; Kwon DH; Shim JS; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 32033790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.
    Thompson GA; Nick C; Francisco P; Lux L; Wiens JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 33736862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoral scanner-based virtual facebow transferring: A chairside dental technique.
    Yang S; Wu L; Alabkaa B; Lepidi L; Yue L; Li J
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38985098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique].
    Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
    Galanis A; Ali M; Belles D; Koeppen RG
    Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
    Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38778662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual Articulators and Virtual Mounting Procedures: Where Do We Stand?
    Lepidi L; Galli M; Mastrangelo F; Venezia P; Joda T; Wang HL; Li J
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan; 30(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 32827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
    Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
    Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the impact of the facial scanning method on the precision of a virtual facebow record technique: An in vivo study.
    Amezua X; Iturrate M; Garikano X; Solaberrieta E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):382-391. PubMed ID: 34916065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital application of three-dimensional diagnosis and treatment with a virtual articulator.
    Lee KC; Park JH; Kim JC; Lee S; Moon D; Lee GH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):710-722. PubMed ID: 38131436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
    Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.