These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37247213)
1. The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website. Dong W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Cao X J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e38306. PubMed ID: 37247213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians' Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews. Saifee DH; Hudnall M; Raja U J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e31659. PubMed ID: 35394435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of Patients' Judgments of Their Physicians in Web-Based Written Reviews Using Natural Language Processing: Algorithm Development and Validation. Madanay F; Tu K; Campagna A; Davis JK; Doerstling SS; Chen F; Ubel PA J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug; 26():e50236. PubMed ID: 39088259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients' Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews. Shah AM; Ali M; Qayyum A; Begum A; Han H; Ariza-Montes A; Araya-Castillo L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study. Sehgal NKR; Rader B; Brownstein JS J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e51672. PubMed ID: 39074363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment. Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding Gender Biases and Differences in Web-Based Reviews of Sanctioned Physicians Through a Machine Learning Approach: Mixed Methods Study. Barnett J; Bjarnadóttir MV; Anderson D; Chen C JMIR Form Res; 2022 Sep; 6(9):e34902. PubMed ID: 36074543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation. Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire. Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Han X; Li B; Zhang T; Qu J J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14417. PubMed ID: 32496198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentiment analysis of pain physician reviews on Healthgrades: a physician review website. Cheng CP; Owusu T; Shekane P; Patel AM Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2024 Sep; 49(9):656-660. PubMed ID: 37451825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons. Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Hageman MG; Ring DC; Gregory PJ; Rubash HE; Harmon L Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1590-7. PubMed ID: 25287521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of Patient Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Glaucoma Care. Vought V; Vought R; Herzog A; Habiel MM Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 38103732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis. Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. Schulz PJ; Rothenfluh F J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e14134. PubMed ID: 32250275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Website Traits and Medical Skepticism on Patients' Willingness to Follow Web-Based Medical Advice: Web-Based Experiment. Claggett J; Kitchens B; Paino M; Beisecker Levin K J Med Internet Res; 2022 Feb; 24(2):e29275. PubMed ID: 35179506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A sentiment analysis on online psychiatrist reviews to identify clinical attributes of psychiatrists that shape the therapeutic alliance. Park SH; Cheng CP; Buehler NJ; Sanford T; Torrey W Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1174154. PubMed ID: 37398580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Let's not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots. Stapels JG; Eyssel F PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244697. PubMed ID: 33439891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]