167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37247213)
1. The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website.
Dong W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Cao X
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e38306. PubMed ID: 37247213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians' Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews.
Saifee DH; Hudnall M; Raja U
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e31659. PubMed ID: 35394435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients' Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews.
Shah AM; Ali M; Qayyum A; Begum A; Han H; Ariza-Montes A; Araya-Castillo L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding Gender Biases and Differences in Web-Based Reviews of Sanctioned Physicians Through a Machine Learning Approach: Mixed Methods Study.
Barnett J; Bjarnadóttir MV; Anderson D; Chen C
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Sep; 6(9):e34902. PubMed ID: 36074543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.
Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.
Han X; Li B; Zhang T; Qu J
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14417. PubMed ID: 32496198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?
Hageman MG; Ring DC; Gregory PJ; Rubash HE; Harmon L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1590-7. PubMed ID: 25287521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of Patient Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Glaucoma Care.
Vought V; Vought R; Herzog A; Habiel MM
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 38103732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors.
Schulz PJ; Rothenfluh F
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e14134. PubMed ID: 32250275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Website Traits and Medical Skepticism on Patients' Willingness to Follow Web-Based Medical Advice: Web-Based Experiment.
Claggett J; Kitchens B; Paino M; Beisecker Levin K
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Feb; 24(2):e29275. PubMed ID: 35179506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A sentiment analysis on online psychiatrist reviews to identify clinical attributes of psychiatrists that shape the therapeutic alliance.
Park SH; Cheng CP; Buehler NJ; Sanford T; Torrey W
Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1174154. PubMed ID: 37398580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Let's not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots.
Stapels JG; Eyssel F
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244697. PubMed ID: 33439891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sentiment Analysis of Online Patient-Written Reviews of Vascular Surgeons.
Cho LD; Tang JE; Pitaro N; Bai H; Cooke PV; Arvind V; Kim J; Ting W
Ann Vasc Surg; 2023 Jan; 88():249-255. PubMed ID: 36028181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sentiment analysis of pain physician reviews on Healthgrades: a physician review website.
Cheng CP; Owusu T; Shekane P; Patel AM
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37451825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
