These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37247525)
1. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs. Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery. Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage. Baechler S Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs. Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates. Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition. Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis. Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient DNA Sampling in Burglary Investigations. Tièche CC; Dubach M; Zieger M Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review. Tozzo P; Mazzobel E; Marcante B; Delicati A; Caenazzo L Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 36555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trace DNA analysis: do you know what your neighbour is doing? A multi-jurisdictional survey. Raymond JJ; van Oorschot RA; Walsh SJ; Roux C Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 19083785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs. Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique. Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collection techniques of touch DNA deposited on human skin following a strangulation scenario. Alketbi SK Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 37278841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of NucleoSpin® Forensic Filters on DNA recovery from trace DNA swabs. Heathfield LJ; Hitewa AN; Gibbon A; Mole CG Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):284-287. PubMed ID: 35598922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods. Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs. Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework. Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework. Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis. Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples. Liu JY J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]