These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37248050)

  • 1. When Food Fights Back: Skull Morphology and Feeding Behavior of Centipede-Eating Snakes.
    Gripshover ND; Hennessey P; McBrayer LD; Meik JM; Watson CM; Cox CL
    Integr Comp Biol; 2023 Jul; 63(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 37248050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Convergence in trophic morphology and feeding performance among piscivorous natricine snakes.
    Vincent SE; Brandley MC; Herrel A; Alfaro ME
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 22(6):1203-11. PubMed ID: 19389153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feeding behavior and venom toxicity of coral snake Micrurus nigrocinctus (Serpentes: Elapidae) on its natural prey in captivity.
    Urdaneta AH; Bolaños F; Gutiérrez JM
    Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 138(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 15536056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding Biological Roles of Venoms Among the Caenophidia: The Importance of Rear-Fanged Snakes.
    Mackessy SP; Saviola AJ
    Integr Comp Biol; 2016 Nov; 56(5):1004-1021. PubMed ID: 27639275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Diet Preferences Associated to Skulls Shape Diversification in Xenodontine Snakes?
    Klaczko J; Sherratt E; Setz EZ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148375. PubMed ID: 26886549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ontogenetic prey size selection in snakes: predator size and functional limitations to handling minimum prey sizes.
    Hampton PM
    Zoology (Jena); 2018 Feb; 126():103-109. PubMed ID: 29203088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using natricine snakes to test how prey type and size affect predatory behaviors and performance.
    Gripshover ND; Jayne BC
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2023; 17():1134131. PubMed ID: 37214640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allometry of skull morphology, gape size and ingestion performance in the banded watersnake (Nerodia fasciata) feeding on two types of prey.
    Hampton PM
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Feb; 217(Pt 3):472-8. PubMed ID: 24143025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What makes a fang? Phylogenetic and ecological controls on tooth evolution in rear-fanged snakes.
    Westeen EP; Durso AM; Grundler MC; Rabosky DL; Davis Rabosky AR
    BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 32646372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foraging mode, relative prey size and diet breadth: A phylogenetically explicit analysis of snake feeding ecology.
    Glaudas X; Glennon KL; Martins M; Luiselli L; Fearn S; Trembath DF; Jelić D; Alexander GJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 May; 88(5):757-767. PubMed ID: 30828806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The functional meaning of "prey size" in water snakes (Nerodia fasciata, Colubridae).
    Vincent SE; Moon BR; Shine R; Herrel A
    Oecologia; 2006 Mar; 147(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16237539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Snake circumvents constraints on prey size.
    Jayne BC; Voris HK; Ng PK
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):143. PubMed ID: 12110878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perils of ingesting harmful prey by advanced snakes.
    Kornilev YV; Natchev ND; Lillywhite HB
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Feb; 98(1):263-283. PubMed ID: 36192825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ontogeny of striking, prey-handling and envenomation behavior of prairie rattlesnakes (Crotalus v. viridis).
    Hayes WK
    Toxicon; 1991; 29(7):867-75. PubMed ID: 1926185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological integration and modularity in the hyperkinetic feeding system of aquatic-foraging snakes.
    Rhoda D; Polly PD; Raxworthy C; Segall M
    Evolution; 2021 Jan; 75(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 33226114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration.
    Watanabe A; Fabre AC; Felice RN; Maisano JA; Müller J; Herrel A; Goswami A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(29):14688-14697. PubMed ID: 31262818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cranial form and function in association with diet in natricine snakes.
    Hampton PM
    J Morphol; 2011 Dec; 272(12):1435-43. PubMed ID: 21780158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do lizards and snakes really differ in their ability to take large prey? A study of relative prey mass and feeding tactics in lizards.
    Shine R; Thomas J
    Oecologia; 2005 Jul; 144(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 15891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphological convergence as a consequence of extreme functional demands: examples from the feeding system of natricine snakes.
    Herrel A; Vincent SE; Alfaro ME; VAN Wassenbergh S; Vanhooydonck B; Irschick DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1438-48. PubMed ID: 18547353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterochronic Shifts Mediate Ecomorphological Convergence in Skull Shape of Microcephalic Sea Snakes.
    Sherratt E; Sanders KL; Watson A; Hutchinson MN; Lee MSY; Palci A
    Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Sep; 59(3):616-624. PubMed ID: 31065670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.