These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Using natricine snakes to test how prey type and size affect predatory behaviors and performance. Gripshover ND; Jayne BC Front Behav Neurosci; 2023; 17():1134131. PubMed ID: 37214640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allometry of skull morphology, gape size and ingestion performance in the banded watersnake (Nerodia fasciata) feeding on two types of prey. Hampton PM J Exp Biol; 2014 Feb; 217(Pt 3):472-8. PubMed ID: 24143025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What makes a fang? Phylogenetic and ecological controls on tooth evolution in rear-fanged snakes. Westeen EP; Durso AM; Grundler MC; Rabosky DL; Davis Rabosky AR BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 32646372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foraging mode, relative prey size and diet breadth: A phylogenetically explicit analysis of snake feeding ecology. Glaudas X; Glennon KL; Martins M; Luiselli L; Fearn S; Trembath DF; Jelić D; Alexander GJ J Anim Ecol; 2019 May; 88(5):757-767. PubMed ID: 30828806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The functional meaning of "prey size" in water snakes (Nerodia fasciata, Colubridae). Vincent SE; Moon BR; Shine R; Herrel A Oecologia; 2006 Mar; 147(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16237539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ontogeny of striking, prey-handling and envenomation behavior of prairie rattlesnakes (Crotalus v. viridis). Hayes WK Toxicon; 1991; 29(7):867-75. PubMed ID: 1926185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological integration and modularity in the hyperkinetic feeding system of aquatic-foraging snakes. Rhoda D; Polly PD; Raxworthy C; Segall M Evolution; 2021 Jan; 75(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 33226114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration. Watanabe A; Fabre AC; Felice RN; Maisano JA; Müller J; Herrel A; Goswami A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(29):14688-14697. PubMed ID: 31262818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cranial form and function in association with diet in natricine snakes. Hampton PM J Morphol; 2011 Dec; 272(12):1435-43. PubMed ID: 21780158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do lizards and snakes really differ in their ability to take large prey? A study of relative prey mass and feeding tactics in lizards. Shine R; Thomas J Oecologia; 2005 Jul; 144(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 15891833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological convergence as a consequence of extreme functional demands: examples from the feeding system of natricine snakes. Herrel A; Vincent SE; Alfaro ME; VAN Wassenbergh S; Vanhooydonck B; Irschick DJ J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1438-48. PubMed ID: 18547353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]