These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37248350)
41. Economic complexity, greenfield investments, and energy innovation: policy implications for sustainable development goals in newly industrialised economies. Bashir MF; Inglesi-Lotz R; Razi U; Shahzad L Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(24):36013-36027. PubMed ID: 38744767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN+3 Countries: The Role of Environmental Degradation. Shaari MS; Asbullah MH; Zainol Abidin N; Karim ZA; Nangle B Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO Mert M; Bölük G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(21):21669-21681. PubMed ID: 27522202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. How sustainable environment is influenced by the foreign direct investment, financial development, economic growth, globalization, innovation, and urbanization in China. Wang J; Yang L; Yang J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(17):49889-49904. PubMed ID: 36787066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia. Khan MA; Ozturk I Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(7):7244-7255. PubMed ID: 31879883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, and export sophistication of China: an empirical study based on dynamic system GMM and threshold model. Wang H; Yang M; He R; Zheng P Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(48):72090-72100. PubMed ID: 34170470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Ahmad M; Jiang P; Majeed A; Raza MY Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(19):23586-23601. PubMed ID: 32297108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Heterogeneous effects of economic policy uncertainty and foreign direct investment on environmental quality: cross-country evidence. Shabir M; Ali M; Hashmi SH; Bakhsh S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(2):2737-2752. PubMed ID: 34378130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Heterogeneous effects of remittances and institutional quality in reducing environmental deficit in the presence of EKC hypothesis: A global study with the application of panel quantile regression. Usman M; Jahanger A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):37292-37310. PubMed ID: 33713269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Rising environmental degradation and impact of foreign direct investment: An empirical evidence from SAARC region. Waqih MAU; Bhutto NA; Ghumro NH; Kumar S; Salam MA J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():472-480. PubMed ID: 31125893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Carbon dioxide intensity of GDP and environmental degradation in an emerging country. Abbasi KR; Kirikkaleli D; Altuntaş M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(56):84451-84459. PubMed ID: 35779213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Balsalobre-Lorente D; Gokmenoglu KK; Taspinar N; Cantos-Cantos JM Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(22):23010-23026. PubMed ID: 31183758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Analysis of how environmental degradation affects clean energy transition: evidence from the UAE. Kilinc-Ata N; Alshami M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(28):72756-72768. PubMed ID: 37178283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Do foreign direct investments influence environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel autoregressive distributed lag model approach to low-, lower-middle-, upper-middle-, and high-income countries. Baskurt BB; Celik S; Aktan B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(21):31311-31329. PubMed ID: 35001287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A sectoral analysis of the role of Foreign Direct Investment in pollution and energy transition in OECD countries. Caetano RV; Marques AC; Afonso TL; Vieira I J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):114018. PubMed ID: 34731712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Spatial impact of foreign direct investment on ecological footprint in Africa. Arogundade S; Mduduzi B; Hassan AS Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(34):51589-51608. PubMed ID: 35247175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Does the potency of economic globalization and political instability reshape renewable energy usage in the face of environmental degradation? Awosusi AA; Rjoub H; Dördüncü H; Kirikkaleli D Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(9):22686-22701. PubMed ID: 36301393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Factors affecting the ecological footprint: A study on the OECD countries. Kızılgöl Ö; Öndes H Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 849():157757. PubMed ID: 35926619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Threshold effects of capital investments on carbon emissions in G20 economies. Ajide KB; Ibrahim RL Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(29):39052-39070. PubMed ID: 33745025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Sheraz M; Deyi X; Ahmed J; Ullah S; Ullah A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(26):35126-35144. PubMed ID: 33665700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]