These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37248532)

  • 1. Use of a commercially available hydrogel as a novel DNA surface sampling tool.
    Sekowski JW; Simmons B; Lal-Paterson A; Armstrong J; Rastogi VK; Angelini DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1310-1316. PubMed ID: 37248532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
    Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internal validation of the RapidHIT
    Wiley R; Sage K; LaRue B; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():180-188. PubMed ID: 29055861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors.
    Hymus CM; Baxter FO; Ta H; Tran T; de Sousa C; Mountford NS; Tay JW
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Mar; 67():102330. PubMed ID: 37802731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework.
    Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The novel use of a spray-on rubber coating to recover cellular material from the surface of bricks.
    Cahill MJ; Chapman B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102404. PubMed ID: 33038617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct qPCR quantification of unprocessed forensic casework samples.
    Liu JY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():96-104. PubMed ID: 24705062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance testing of a semi-automatic card punch system, using direct STR profiling of DNA from blood samples on FTA™ cards.
    Ogden SJ; Horton JK; Stubbs SL; Tatnell PJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S207-12. PubMed ID: 25407399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
    Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of sample degradation and inhibition on field-based DNA identification of human remains.
    Dawnay N; Flamson R; Hall MJR; Steadman DW
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():46-53. PubMed ID: 30077890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
    Thomasma SM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.