137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37248800)
21. A comparative study of identical VMAT about two adjacent targets with and without fixed-jaw technique.
Xie K; Sun H; Gao L; Lin T; Sui J; Ni X
Radiat Oncol; 2019 May; 14(1):75. PubMed ID: 31068187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dosimetric and delivery comparison of helical tomotherapy with dynamic jaw and fixed jaw for cervical carcinoma.
Wu J; Liu X; Wang P; Li J; Wu F; Tang B; Kang S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021 Dec; 17(7):1626-1630. PubMed ID: 35381731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigation of optimum minimum segment width on VMAT plan quality and deliverability: A comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation using DVH analysis.
Yoosuf AM; Ahmad MB; AlShehri S; Alhadab A; Alqathami M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 22(11):29-40. PubMed ID: 34592787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.
Pokhrel D; Sanford L; Halfman M; Molloy J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):55-63. PubMed ID: 30955251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dosimetric comparison between jaw tracking and static jaw techniques in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Feng Z; Wu H; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Cheng J; Su X
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jan; 10():28. PubMed ID: 25623899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of identical VMAT plans with and without jaw tracking technique.
Wu H; Jiang F; Yue H; Hu Q; Zhang J; Liu Z; Gong J; Li S; Geng J; Zhang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):133-141. PubMed ID: 27685122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for large volume retroperitoneal sarcomas: A comparative analysis of dosimetric and treatment delivery parameters.
Taggar AS; Graham D; Kurien E; Gräfe JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):276-281. PubMed ID: 29178585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy using multicriteria optimization for body and extremity sarcoma.
Young MR; Craft DL; Colbert CM; Remillard K; Vanbenthuysen L; Wang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):283-291. PubMed ID: 27929501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A knowledge-based quantitative approach to characterize treatment plan quality: Application to prostate VMAT planning.
Alnaalwa B; Nwankwo O; Abo-Madyan Y; Giordano FA; Wenz F; Glatting G
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 33119944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A fixed-jaw method to protect critical organs during intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Chen J; Chen X; Huang M; Dai J
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 25087082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Neph R; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3356-3370. PubMed ID: 31169917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.
Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; An HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JH
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):139. PubMed ID: 31387593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative dosimetric study of left sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery treated with VMAT and IMRT.
Zhao H; He M; Cheng G; Han D; Wu N; Shi D; Zhao Z; Jin J
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():231. PubMed ID: 26577189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using multicriteria optimization for localized prostate cancer.
Ghandour S; Matzinger O; Pachoud M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5410. PubMed ID: 26103500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques.
Wei S; Lin H; Isabelle Choi J; Shi C; Simone CB; Kang M
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Oct; 175():238-247. PubMed ID: 35961583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric and feasibility evaluation of a CBCT-based daily adaptive radiotherapy protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Branco D; Mayadev J; Moore K; Ray X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13783. PubMed ID: 36208134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimal dose limitation strategy for bone marrow sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Bao Z; Wang D; Chen S; Chen M; Jiang D; Yang C; Liu H; Dai J; Xie C
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):118. PubMed ID: 31378200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
