141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37249075)
1. Assessing Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Risk for Transformation to Cancer: Comparison Between Histologic Grading Systems Versus S100A7 Immunohistochemical Signature-based Grading.
Darling MR; Hwang JTK; Dickson BJ; Cutz JC; Salama S; McCord C; Pritzker KPH; Mock D; Thompson LDR
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Jul; 31(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 37249075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.
Kujan O; Oliver RJ; Khattab A; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2006 Nov; 42(10):987-93. PubMed ID: 16731030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. S100A7 overexpression is a predictive marker for high risk of malignant transformation in oral dysplasia.
Kaur J; Matta A; Kak I; Srivastava G; Assi J; Leong I; Witterick I; Colgan TJ; Macmillan C; Siu KW; Walfish PG; Ralhan R
Int J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 134(6):1379-88. PubMed ID: 24122701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical utility of contemporary oral epithelial dysplasia grading systems.
Sathasivam HP; Sloan P; Thomson PJ; Robinson M
J Oral Pathol Med; 2022 Feb; 51(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 34797585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individualized five-year risk assessment for oral premalignant lesion progression to cancer.
Hwang JT; Gu YR; Shen M; Ralhan R; Walfish PG; Pritzker KP; Mock D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):374-381. PubMed ID: 28110942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nuclear S100A7 is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck cancer.
Tripathi SC; Matta A; Kaur J; Grigull J; Chauhan SS; Thakar A; Shukla NK; Duggal R; DattaGupta S; Ralhan R; Siu KW
PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11939. PubMed ID: 20689826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Diagnosis of Oral Dysplasia.
R SA; B N P; Hegde U; K U; G S; G K; Sil S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3251-3254. PubMed ID: 29286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observer agreement in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia.
Brothwell DJ; Lewis DW; Bradley G; Leong I; Jordan RC; Mock D; Leake JL
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 31(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 12846853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ki-67 Prognostic Value in Different Histological Grades of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Takkem A; Barakat C; Zakaraia S; Zaid K; Najmeh J; Ayoub M; Seirawan MY
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3279-3286. PubMed ID: 30486632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Review of Diagnostic Criteria for Anatomic Pathologists.
Cheung VKY; Hulme K; Schifter M; Palme C; Low TH; Clark J; Gupta R
Adv Anat Pathol; 2022 Jul; 29(4):227-240. PubMed ID: 35435865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
Kujan O; Khattab A; Oliver RJ; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia.
Manchanda A; Shetty DC
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Nov; 17(6):e935-42. PubMed ID: 22549675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of malignant transformation and recurrence of oral epithelial dysplasia using architectural and cytological feature specific prognostic models.
Mahmood H; Bradburn M; Rajpoot N; Islam NM; Kujan O; Khurram SA
Mod Pathol; 2022 Sep; 35(9):1151-1159. PubMed ID: 35361889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demystifying oral epithelial dysplasia: a histological guide.
Hankinson P; Mahmood H; Walsh H; Speight PM; Khurram SA
Pathology; 2024 Feb; 56(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 38030478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of histological grading and large-scale genomic status (DNA ploidy) as prognostic tools in oral dysplasia.
Sudbø J; Bryne M; Johannessen AC; Kildal W; Danielsen HE; Reith A
J Pathol; 2001 Jul; 194(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 11439362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combination of Binary System with Ki67 Immunohistochemical Staining: a Reliable Grading Method for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia.
Akafzadeh N; Baghaei F; Derakhshan S; Moradzadeh Khiavi M; Kharazifard M; Aminishakib P
J Dent (Shiraz); 2022 Sep; 23(2 Suppl):377-382. PubMed ID: 36588968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral squamous cell carcinoma grading systems--analysis of the best survival predictor.
Lindenblatt Rde C; Martinez GL; Silva LE; Faria PS; Camisasca DR; Lourenço Sde Q
J Oral Pathol Med; 2012 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21902722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Grading oral epithelial dysplasia: analysis of individual features.
Tilakaratne WM; Sherriff M; Morgan PR; Odell EW
J Oral Pathol Med; 2011 Aug; 40(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 21501232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration improves the agreement in grading oral epithelial dysplasia-Findings from a National Workshop in Malaysia.
Kallarakkal TG; Zaini ZM; Ghani WMN; Karen-Ng LP; Siriwardena BSMS; Cheong SC; Tilakaratne WM
J Oral Pathol Med; 2024 Jan; 53(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 38081145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral epithelial dysplasia: Recognition, grading and clinical significance.
Odell E; Kujan O; Warnakulasuriya S; Sloan P
Oral Dis; 2021 Nov; 27(8):1947-1976. PubMed ID: 34418233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
