185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37250692)
1. Neurorehabilitation robotics: how much control should therapists have?
Hasson CJ; Manczurowsky J; Collins EC; Yarossi M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1179418. PubMed ID: 37250692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. THERAPIST: Towards an Autonomous Socially Interactive Robot for Motor and Neurorehabilitation Therapies for Children.
Calderita LV; Manso LJ; Bustos P; Suárez-Mejías C; Fernández F; Bandera A
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Oct; 1(1):e1. PubMed ID: 28582242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intelligent Robotics Incorporating Machine Learning Algorithms for Improving Functional Capacity Evaluation and Occupational Rehabilitation.
Fong J; Ocampo R; Gross DP; Tavakoli M
J Occup Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 30(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32253595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning Post-Stroke Gait Training Strategies by Modeling Patient-Therapist Interaction.
Sorkhabadi SMR; Smith M; Khodmbashi R; Lopez R; Raasch M; Maruyama T; Kwasnica C; Zhang W
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023 Mar; PP():. PubMed ID: 37028304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation.
Lünenburger L; Colombo G; Riener R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 4():1. PubMed ID: 17244363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 May; 20(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 22623406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot.
Metzger JC; Lambercy O; Califfi A; Dinacci D; Petrillo C; Rossi P; Conti FM; Gassert R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 11():154. PubMed ID: 25399249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated patient-robot assignment for a robotic rehabilitation gym: a simplified simulation model.
Miller BA; Adhikari B; Jiang C; Novak VD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 36384813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective.
Gassert R; Dietz V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 29866106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots.
Sawers A; Ting LH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Oct; 11():142. PubMed ID: 25284060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.
Huang VS; Krakauer JW
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 6():5. PubMed ID: 19243614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An overview of robotic/mechanical devices for post-stroke thumb rehabilitation.
Suarez-Escobar M; Rendon-Velez E
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):683-703. PubMed ID: 29334274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pediatric robotic rehabilitation: Current knowledge and future trends in treating children with sensorimotor impairments.
Michmizos KP; Krebs HI
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28505989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The "Beam-Me-In Strategy" - remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy.
Baur K; Rohrbach N; Hermsdörfer J; Riener R; Klamroth-Marganska V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):85. PubMed ID: 31296226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planning, execution and monitoring of physical rehabilitation therapies with a robotic architecture.
González JC; Pulido JC; Fernández F; Suárez-Mejías C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():339-43. PubMed ID: 25991162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliable and valid robot-assisted assessments of hand proprioceptive, motor and sensorimotor impairments after stroke.
Zbytniewska M; Kanzler CM; Jordan L; Salzmann C; Liepert J; Lambercy O; Gassert R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 34271954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic approaches for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke.
Lum PS; Godfrey SB; Brokaw EB; Holley RJ; Nichols D
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S242-54. PubMed ID: 23080040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The realization of robotic neurorehabilitation in clinical: use of computational intelligence and future prospects analysis.
Yang J; Zhao Z; Du C; Wang W; Peng Q; Qiu J; Wang G
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1311-1322. PubMed ID: 33252284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.
Park JH; Park G; Kim HY; Lee JY; Ham Y; Hwang D; Kwon S; Shin JH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 33076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Child and parent perceptions of acceptability and therapeutic value of a socially assistive robot used during pediatric rehabilitation.
Butchart J; Harrison R; Ritchie J; Martí F; McCarthy C; Knight S; Scheinberg A
Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 43(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 31120794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
