206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37251670)
1. Diagnostic performance of adult-based ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xing Z; Qiu Y; Zhu J; Su A; Wu W
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1187935. PubMed ID: 37251670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Yoon HM; Hwang J; Lee JS; Jung AY; Cho YA; Baek JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7450-7463. PubMed ID: 33864505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim DH; Kim SW; Basurrah MA; Lee J; Hwang SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 36752367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of Four Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim PH; Suh CH; Baek JH; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Lee JH
Thyroid; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 32303153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ultrasound risk stratification systems for pediatric thyroid nodules.
Yu J; Cui Y; Fu C; Ma X; Si C; Huang Y; Cui K; Zhang Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2024; 15():1350123. PubMed ID: 38572472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Six Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems in the Diagnosis of AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodules.
Li Q; Yang L; Yang L; Jiang X; Li S
Acad Radiol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):131-141. PubMed ID: 37225530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Joo L; Lee MK; Lee JY; Ha EJ; Na DG
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul); 2023 Feb; 38(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 36891658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems: Comparison of ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ATA Guidelines.
Yucel S; Balci IG; Tomak L
Ultrasound Q; 2023 Dec; 39(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 37918114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.
Gao L; Xi X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Wang Y; Zhu S; Lai X; Zhang X; Zhao R; Zhang B
Endocrine; 2019 Apr; 64(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 30659427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang L; Li C; Chen Z; He S; Wang Z; Liu J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1227339. PubMed ID: 37720531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 or 5 for diagnosing malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DH; Chung SR; Choi SH; Kim KW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5611-5624. PubMed ID: 32356157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the Performance of Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems in Thyroid Nodules of Pediatric Patients.
Scappaticcio L; Maiorino MI; Iorio S; Docimo G; Longo M; Grandone A; Luongo C; Cozzolino I; Piccardo A; Trimboli P; Miraglia Del Giudice E; Esposito K; Bellastella G
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 34771467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unnecessary thyroid nodule biopsy rates under four ultrasound risk stratification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Suh CH; Baek JH; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Lee JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2877-2885. PubMed ID: 33057762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of Five Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems in Selecting Thyroid Nodules for FNA.
Castellana M; Castellana C; Treglia G; Giorgino F; Giovanella L; Russ G; Trimboli P
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2020 May; 105(5):. PubMed ID: 31690937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.
Hong HS; Lee JY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):444-450. PubMed ID: 31039023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy.
Koc AM; Adıbelli ZH; Erkul Z; Sahin Y; Dilek I
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109390. PubMed ID: 33181485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences among the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System proposed by Korean, the American College of Radiology and the European Thyroid Association in the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules.
Shi YX; Chen L; Liu YC; Zhan J; Diao XH; Fang L; Chen Y
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 9(8):4958-4967. PubMed ID: 35117857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can the American Thyroid Association, K-Tirads, and Acr-Tirads Ultrasound Classification Systems Be Used to Predict Malignancy in Bethesda Category IV Nodules?
Yang W; Fananapazir G; LaRoy J; Wilson M; Campbell MJ
Endocr Pract; 2020 Sep; 26(9):945-952. PubMed ID: 33471698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the diagnostic performance and clinical role of different ultrasound-based thyroid malignancy risk stratification systems for medullary thyroid carcinoma.
Jiang L; Zhu HB; Liang ZW; Chen L; Sun XM; Shao YH; Chen LZ
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jun; 13(6):3776-3788. PubMed ID: 37284109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
