These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37251985)

  • 21. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry.
    Lee HK; Kim MK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):269. PubMed ID: 30340561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Venkataraman AP; Dalin A; Brautaset R; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2023 Jun; 10(1):24. PubMed ID: 37264436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.
    Akalın İ; Tüfek M; Türkyılmaz M; Öztürk F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 39(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 29931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Balducci N; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 32050229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.
    Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry.
    Gao R; Chen H; Savini G; Miao Y; Wang X; Yang J; Zhao W; Wang Q; Huang J
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2484. PubMed ID: 28559547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].
    Chiseliţă D; Cantemir A; Gălăţanu C; Irod A
    Oftalmologia; 2011; 55(4):104-10. PubMed ID: 22642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry Devices in Dense Cataracts.
    Vasavada SA; Patel P; Vaishnav VR; Ashena Z; Srivastava S; Vasavada V; Nanavaty MA
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Aug; 36(8):557-564. PubMed ID: 32785730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900.
    Song JS; Yoon DY; Hyon JY; Jeon HS
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 32233146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Precision of a new device for biometric measurements in pseudophakic eyes].
    Hildebrandt AL; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Aug; 108(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 21607812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of two swept-source optical biometers in eyes with dense cataracts.
    Orts-Vila P; Tañá-Sanz S; Tello-Elordi C; Montés-Micó R; Tañá-Rivero P
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1449867. PubMed ID: 39386744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Aramberri J; Huang J; Barboni P
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):690-695. PubMed ID: 28991337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. COMPARISON OF OPTICAL BIOMETERS ARGOS AND IOL MASTER 700.
    Románek J; Sluková K
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2021; 77(6):295-299. PubMed ID: 35081719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical outcomes with toric intraocular lenses planned using an optical low coherence reflectometry ocular biometer with a new toric calculator.
    Gundersen KG; Potvin R
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():2141-2147. PubMed ID: 27843285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Agreement of intraocular lens power calculation between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers.
    Pfaeffli OA; Weber A; Hoffer KJ; Savini G; Baenninger PB; Thiel MA; Taroni L; Müller L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 May; 48(5):535-541. PubMed ID: 34417784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry.
    Higashiyama T; Mori H; Nakajima F; Ohji M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196401. PubMed ID: 29689110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Refractive prediction error in cataract surgery using an optical biometer equipped with anterior segment OCT.
    Kato Y; Kojima T; Tamaoki A; Ichikawa K; Tamura K; Ichikawa K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Apr; 48(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 34417778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Astigmatism Prediction Accuracy for Toric Lens Implantation from Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices.
    Melendez RF; Smits G; Nguyen T; Ruffaner-Hanson CD; Ortiz D; Hall B
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():3795-3802. PubMed ID: 36419565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.