These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37253958)

  • 1. Voice analytics in the wild: Validity and predictive accuracy of common audio-recording devices.
    Busquet F; Efthymiou F; Hildebrand C
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2114-2134. PubMed ID: 37253958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparability of modern recording devices for speech analysis: smartphone, landline, laptop, and hard disc recorder.
    Vogel AP; Rosen KM; Morgan AT; Reilly S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2014; 66(6):244-50. PubMed ID: 25676365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
    Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
    van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plug-and-Play Microphones for Recording Speech and Voice with Smart Devices.
    Noffs G; Cobler-Lichter M; Perera T; Kolbe SC; Butzkueven H; Boonstra FMC; van der Walt A; Vogel AP
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2024; 76(4):372-385. PubMed ID: 37972580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
    Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
    Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration of Clinical Audio Recording and Analysis Systems for Sound Intensity Measurement.
    Maryn Y; Zarowski A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015 Nov; 24(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 26161588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Remote Signal Transmission and Recording on Acoustical Measures of Simulated Essential Vocal Tremor: Considerations for Remote Treatment Research and Telepractice.
    Lester-Smith RA; Jebaily CG; Story BH
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 34702610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
    Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method of forensic authentication of audio recordings generated using the Voice Memos application in the iPhone.
    Park NI; Lee JW; Shim KS; Byun JS; Jeon OY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110702. PubMed ID: 33561789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise.
    Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Kregždytė R
    J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Acoustic Voice Features Derived From Mobile Devices and Studio Microphone Recordings.
    Fahed VS; Doheny EP; Busse M; Hoblyn J; Lowery MM
    J Voice; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36379826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Audio Data Compression on Feature Extraction for Vocal Biomarker Detection: Validation Study.
    Oreskovic J; Kaufman J; Fossat Y
    JMIR Biomed Eng; 2024 Apr; 9():e56246. PubMed ID: 38875677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoral voice recording-towards a new smartphone-based method for vocal rehabilitation.
    Schuldt T; Kramp B; Ovari A; Timmermann D; Dommerich S; Mlynski R; Ottl P
    HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(Suppl 2):63-70. PubMed ID: 30105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of naturalistic smartphone positioning on acoustic measures of voicea).
    McKenna VS; Roberts RM; Friedman AD; Shanley SN; Llico AF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jul; 154(1):323-333. PubMed ID: 37450331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classification of voice quality using neck-surface acceleration: Comparison with glottal flow and radiated sound.
    Włodarczak M; Ludusan B; Sundberg J; Heldner M
    J Voice; 2022 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 36028369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intraoral voice recording-towards a new smartphone-based method for vocal rehabilitation. German version].
    Schuldt T; Kramp B; Ovari A; Timmermann D; Dommerich S; Mlynski R; Ottl P
    HNO; 2018 Oct; 66(10):760-768. PubMed ID: 30203388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microphone and Audio Compression Effects on Acoustic Voice Analysis: A Pilot Study.
    Cavalcanti JC; Englert M; Oliveira M; Constantini AC
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 33451892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.