143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37254060)
1. CRISPR-GRANT: a cross-platform graphical analysis tool for high-throughput CRISPR-based genome editing evaluation.
Fu H; Shan C; Kang F; Yu L; Li Z; Yin Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 24(1):219. PubMed ID: 37254060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BATCH-GE: Batch analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing data for genome editing assessment.
Boel A; Steyaert W; De Rocker N; Menten B; Callewaert B; De Paepe A; Coucke P; Willaert A
Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():30330. PubMed ID: 27461955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cas-analyzer: an online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data.
Park J; Lim K; Kim JS; Bae S
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):286-288. PubMed ID: 27559154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AutoESDCas: A Web-Based Tool for the Whole-Workflow Editing Sequence Design for Microbial Genome Editing Based on the CRISPR/Cas System.
Yang C; Yang Y; Chu G; Wang R; Li H; Mao Y; Wang M; Zhang J; Liao X; Ma H
ACS Synth Biol; 2024 Jun; 13(6):1737-1749. PubMed ID: 38845097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CRISPR-detector: fast and accurate detection, visualization, and annotation of genome-wide mutations induced by genome editing events.
Huang L; Wang D; Chen H; Hu J; Dai X; Liu C; Li A; Shen X; Qi C; Sun H; Zhang D; Chen T; Jiang Y
J Genet Genomics; 2023 Aug; 50(8):563-572. PubMed ID: 37003351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data Comparison and Software Design for Easy Selection and Application of CRISPR-based Genome Editing Systems in Plants.
Wang Y; Lecourieux F; Zhang R; Dai Z; Lecourieux D; Li S; Liang Z
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 19(6):937-948. PubMed ID: 34280549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CRIS.py: A Versatile and High-throughput Analysis Program for CRISPR-based Genome Editing.
Connelly JP; Pruett-Miller SM
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4194. PubMed ID: 30862905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CRISPRimmunity: an interactive web server for CRISPR-associated Important Molecular events and Modulators Used in geNome edIting Tool identifYing.
Zhou F; Yu X; Gan R; Ren K; Chen C; Ren C; Cui M; Liu Y; Gao Y; Wang S; Yin M; Huang T; Huang Z; Zhang F
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jul; 51(W1):W93-W107. PubMed ID: 37216595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BATCH-GE: Analysis of NGS Data for Genome Editing Assessment.
Steyaert W; Boel A; Coucke P; Willaert A
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1865():83-90. PubMed ID: 30151760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CRISPRMatch: An Automatic Calculation and Visualization Tool for High-throughput CRISPR Genome-editing Data Analysis.
You Q; Zhong Z; Ren Q; Hassan F; Zhang Y; Zhang T
Int J Biol Sci; 2018; 14(8):858-862. PubMed ID: 29989077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GOANA: A Universal High-Throughput Web Service for Assessing and Comparing the Outcome and Efficiency of Genome Editing Experiments.
Reti D; O'Brien A; Wetzel P; Tay A; Bauer DC; Wilson LOW
CRISPR J; 2021 Apr; 4(2):243-252. PubMed ID: 33876955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of efficiency prediction algorithms and development of ensemble model for CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA selection.
Chen Y; Wang X
Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 38(23):5175-5181. PubMed ID: 36227031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic Comparison of Computational Tools for Sanger Sequencing-Based Genome Editing Analysis.
Aoki K; Yamasaki M; Umezono R; Hamamoto T; Kamachi Y
Cells; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38334653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Boosting targeted genome editing using the hei-tag.
Thumberger T; Tavhelidse-Suck T; Gutierrez-Triana JA; Cornean A; Medert R; Welz B; Freichel M; Wittbrodt J
Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35333175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. caRpools: an R package for exploratory data analysis and documentation of pooled CRISPR/Cas9 screens.
Winter J; Breinig M; Heigwer F; Brügemann D; Leible S; Pelz O; Zhan T; Boutros M
Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):632-4. PubMed ID: 26508755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrepancies in indel software resolution with somatic CRISPR/Cas9 tumorigenesis models.
Brockman QR; Scherer A; McGivney GR; Gutierrez WR; Rytlewski J; Sheehan A; Warrier A; Laverty EA; Roughton G; Carnevale NC; Knepper-Adrian V; Dodd RD
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14798. PubMed ID: 37684258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple and practical workflow for genotyping of CRISPR-Cas9-based knockout phenotypes using multiplexed amplicon sequencing.
Iida M; Suzuki M; Sakane Y; Nishide H; Uchiyama I; Yamamoto T; Suzuki KT; Fujii S
Genes Cells; 2020 Jul; 25(7):498-509. PubMed ID: 32323394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SNVerGUI: a desktop tool for variant analysis of next-generation sequencing data.
Wang W; Hu W; Hou F; Hu P; Wei Z
J Med Genet; 2012 Dec; 49(12):753-5. PubMed ID: 23024288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development.
Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H
BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Gene Sculpt Suite: a set of tools for genome editing.
Mann CM; Martínez-Gálvez G; Welker JM; Wierson WA; Ata H; Almeida MP; Clark KJ; Essner JJ; McGrail M; Ekker SC; Dobbs D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(W1):W175-W182. PubMed ID: 31127311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
