202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37254534)
1. Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.
Pittman AL; Stewart EC
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231177509. PubMed ID: 37254534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
Johnson EE; Dillon H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.
Johnson EE
Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities.
Ching TYC; Zhang VW; Johnson EE; Van Buynder P; Hou S; Burns L; Button L; Flynn C; McGhie K
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S41-S54. PubMed ID: 28971727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].
Engler M; Digeser F; Hoppe U
HNO; 2022 Jul; 70(7):520-532. PubMed ID: 35061063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Battles J; Neumann S; Manning J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):196-205. PubMed ID: 34758503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.
Portelli D; Loteta S; Ciodaro F; Salvago P; Galletti C; Freni L; Alberti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.
Ching TY; Johnson EE; Hou S; Dillon H; Zhang V; Burns L; van Buynder P; Wong A; Flynn C
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. PubMed ID: 24350692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial Hearing in Children With and Without Hearing Loss: Where and What the Speech Is Matters for Local Speech Intelligibility.
Pittman AL; Pastore MT
Am J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 33(2):442-454. PubMed ID: 38557158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fit-to-Targets and Aided Speech Intelligibility Index Values for Hearing Aids Fitted to the DSL v5-Adult Prescription.
Dao A; Folkeard P; Baker S; Pumford J; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Feb; 32(2):90-98. PubMed ID: 33296929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of the NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0a prescription procedures in the adaptation of hearing aids in the elderly.
Bertozzo MC; Blasca WQ
Codas; 2019 Aug; 31(4):e20180171. PubMed ID: 31433039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
