These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37254613)

  • 1. Percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression and interspinous spacers for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A 2-year Medicare Claims Benchmark Study.
    Staats PS; Hagedorn JM; Reece DE; Strand NH; Poree L
    Pain Pract; 2023 Sep; 23(7):776-784. PubMed ID: 37254613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal Comparative Analysis of Complications and Subsequent Interventions Following Stand-Alone Interspinous Spacers, Open Decompression, or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis.
    Whang PG; Tran O; Rosner HL
    Adv Ther; 2023 Aug; 40(8):3512-3524. PubMed ID: 37289411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.
    Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Davis RP; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 25494323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison analysis of safety outcomes and the rate of subsequent spinal procedures between interspinous spacer without decompression versus minimally invasive lumbar decompression.
    Rosner HL; Tran O; Vajdi T; Vijjeswarapu MA
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2024 Jan; 49(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 37247945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
    Staats PS; Chafin TB; Golovac S; Kim CK; Li S; Richardson WB; Vallejo R; Wahezi SE; Washabaugh EP; Benyamin RM;
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comprehensive Review of Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain: Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Disc Disease-MILD Percutaneous Image Guided Lumbar Decompression, Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer, MinuteMan G3 Interspinous-Interlaminar Fusion.
    Kaye AD; Edinoff AN; Temple SN; Kaye AJ; Chami AA; Shah RJ; Dixon BM; Alvarado MA; Cornett EM; Viswanath O; Urits I; Calodney AK
    Adv Ther; 2021 Sep; 38(9):4628-4645. PubMed ID: 34398386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices.
    Tapp SJ; Martin BI; Tosteson TD; Lurie JD; Weinstein MC; Deyo RA; Mirza SK; Tosteson ANA
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):584-592. PubMed ID: 28847740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Deer TR; Chafin TB; Costandi SJ; Qu H; Kim C; Jassal N; Patel K; Calodney A
    Pain Pract; 2024 Jan; 24(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 37661347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the Medicare population.
    Deyo RA; Martin BI; Ching A; Tosteson AN; Jarvik JG; Kreuter W; Mirza SK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):865-72. PubMed ID: 23324936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections.
    Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
    Pain Manag; 2022 Mar; 12(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 34344197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.
    Deer TR; Costandi SJ; Washabaugh E; Chafin TB; Wahezi SE; Jassal N; Sayed D
    Pain Med; 2022 Apr; 23(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 35167700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two interspinous spacers for treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jul; 15():221. PubMed ID: 24996648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The importance of interspinous spacers in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Vinas-Rios JM; Arabmotlagh M; Rahim T; Schmidt S; Sellei RM; Rauschmann M
    Orthopade; 2019 Oct; 48(10):831-836. PubMed ID: 31297556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.
    Beyer F; Yagdiran A; Neu P; Kaulhausen T; Eysel P; Sobottke R
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Sep; 22(9):2015-21. PubMed ID: 23625306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of subsequent surgical decompression following minimally invasive approaches to treat lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective review.
    Shahzad H; Hussain N; D'Souza RS; Bhatti N; Orhurhu V; Abdel-Rasoul M; Simopoulos T; Essandoh MK; Khan SN; Weaver T
    Pain Pract; 2024 Mar; 24(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 37955267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kuchta J; Sobottke R; Eysel P; Simons P
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 19387698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.