These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3725562)

  • 1. Below-knee amputation: a comparison of the effect of the SACH foot and single axis foot on electromyographic patterns during locomotion.
    Culham EG; Peat M; Newell E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3725562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ground reaction forces and center of pressure patterns in the gait of children with amputation: preliminary report.
    Zernicke RF; Hoy MG; Whiting WC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Nov; 66(11):736-41. PubMed ID: 4062525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation.
    Barr AE; Siegel KL; Danoff JV; McGarvey CL; Tomasko A; Sable I; Stanhope SJ
    Phys Ther; 1992 May; 72(5):344-54. PubMed ID: 1631203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
    Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electromyographic temporal analysis of gait: normal human locomotion.
    Dubo HI; Peat M; Winter DA; Quanbury AO; Hobson DA; Steinke T; Reimer G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1976 Sep; 57(9):415-20. PubMed ID: 962568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking.
    Gitter A; Czerniecki JM; DeGroot DM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Jun; 70(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2039616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Schweiger GP; Perry J; Powers CM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jun; (303):185-92. PubMed ID: 8194232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet.
    Prince F; Winter DA; Sjonnensen G; Powell C; Wheeldon RK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 9651889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
    Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
    Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trans-tibial amputee gait: time-distance parameters and EMG activity.
    Isakov E; Keren O; Benjuya N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Dec; 24(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 11195356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
    Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stance phase control of above-knee prostheses: knee control versus SACH foot design.
    Stein JL; Flowers WC
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 3558425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Running patterns of juveniles wearing SACH and single-axis foot components.
    Brouwer BJ; Allard P; Labelle H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Feb; 70(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 2916930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electromyographic temporal analysis of gait: hemiplegic locomotion.
    Peat M; Dubo HI; Winter DA; Quanbury AO; Steinke T; Grahame R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1976 Sep; 57(9):421-5. PubMed ID: 962569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet.
    Goh JC; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1984 Dec; 8(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 6522257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot.
    Lehmann JF; Price R; Boswell-Bessette S; Dralle A; Questad K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Aug; 74(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 8347071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimisation of the prescription for trans-tibial (TT) amputees.
    Cortés A; Viosca E; Hoyos JV; Prat J; Sánchez-Lacuesta J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 9453087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.