145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37256331)
21. Value of Second-Opinion Interpretation of Outside-Facility Breast Imaging Studies to a Radiology Department and Cancer Center.
Tuite CM; Boros MC; Ruth K
J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Apr; 19(4):552-560. PubMed ID: 35216943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Subspecialty Second-Opinion in Multiple Myeloma CT: Emphasis on Clinically Significant Lytic Lesions.
Tagliafico AS; Belgioia L; Bonsignore A; Rossi F; Succio G; Bignotti B; Dominietto A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 32340143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys.
Karmazyn B; Wanner MR; Marine MB; Tilmans L; Jennings SG; Hibbard RA
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Feb; 49(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 30367201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Second opinions in orthopedic oncology imaging: can fellowship training reduce clinically significant discrepancies?
Rozenberg A; Kenneally BE; Abraham JA; Strogus K; Roedl JB; Morrison WB; Zoga AC
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Jan; 48(1):143-147. PubMed ID: 30003278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast Imaging Second Opinions Impact Surgical Management.
Spivey TL; Carlson KA; Janssen I; Witt TR; Jokich P; Madrigrano A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):2359-64. PubMed ID: 25608767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Providing second-opinion interpretations of pediatric imaging: embracing the call for value-added medicine.
Sammer MBK; Kan JH
Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Apr; 51(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 33743036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Specialized Second Opinion Review of Breast MRI Impacts Management and Increases Cancer Detection.
Weinfurtner RJ; Mooney B; Forbus J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):922-927. PubMed ID: 30833163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care.
Lakhman Y; D'Anastasi M; Miccò M; Scelzo C; Vargas HA; Nougaret S; Sosa RE; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2089-98. PubMed ID: 26494640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Unread Second-Opinion Radiology Reports: A Potential Waste of Health Care Resources.
Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Oct; 215(4):934-939. PubMed ID: 32783557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiology E-Consults: Reinterpretation of Outside CT and MRI Exams to Improve Quality, Reduce Unneeded Imaging, and Lower Costs.
Cameron SF; Schwartz RK
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2024; 53(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 37722979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Second-Opinion Review of Breast Imaging at a Cancer Center: Is It Worthwhile?
Coffey K; D'Alessio D; Keating DM; Morris EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 28301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: the value of reinterpreting abdominal CT performed at other institutions.
Kalbhen CL; Yetter EM; Olson MC; Posniak HV; Aranha GV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 9843290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ensuring Appropriateness of Pediatric Second Opinion Consultations.
Glavis-Bloom J; Yang U; Nahl D; Goodarzian F; Sura A
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(2):82-84. PubMed ID: 31147095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does Second Reader Opinion Affect Patient Management in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?
Corrias G; Huicochea Castellanos S; Merkow R; Langan R; Balachandran V; Ragucci M; Carollo G; Mancini M; Saba L; Mannelli L
Acad Radiol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):825-832. PubMed ID: 29373213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. JOURNAL CLUB: Informal Consultations Between Radiologists and Referring Physicians, as Identified Through an Electronic Medical Record Search.
Won E; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):965-969. PubMed ID: 28726504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Frequency and Clinical Utility of Alerts for Intra-Institutional Radiologist Discrepant Opinions.
DiPiro PJ; Licaros A; Zhao AH; Glazer DI; Healey MJ; Curley PJ; Giess CS; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Apr; 20(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 36841320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT studies by subspecialty experts in stroke imaging.
Jordan YJ; Jordan JE; Lightfoote JB; Ragland KD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 23169731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recommendations for additional imaging of abdominal imaging examinations: frequency, benefit, and cost.
Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 31451972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative FDG PET/CT in the community: experience from interpretation of outside oncologic PET/CT exams in referred cancer patients.
Tahari AK; Wahl RL
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Apr; 58(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 24314055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
