199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37257235)
21. A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.
Hwang J; Lee T; Lee H; Byun S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28659. PubMed ID: 35044311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "Many roads lead to Rome and the Artificial Intelligence only shows me one road": an interview study on physician attitudes regarding the implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems.
Van Cauwenberge D; Van Biesen W; Decruyenaere J; Leune T; Sterckx S
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 May; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 35524301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Precision radiotherapy via information integration of expert human knowledge and AI recommendation to optimize clinical decision making.
Sun W; Niraula D; El Naqa I; Ten Haken RK; Dinov ID; Cuneo K; Jin JJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106927. PubMed ID: 35675722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance in primary care during the coronavirus pandemic: What is the role of patients' gender, age and health awareness? A two-phase pilot study.
Chalutz Ben-Gal H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():931225. PubMed ID: 36699881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Handle with care: Assessing performance measures of medical AI for shared clinical decision-making.
Holm S
Bioethics; 2022 Feb; 36(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 34427331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical considerations for the use of artificial intelligence in medical decision-making capacity assessments.
MacIntyre MR; Cockerill RG; Mirza OF; Appel JM
Psychiatry Res; 2023 Oct; 328():115466. PubMed ID: 37717548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.
Nakayama K; Osaka W; Matsubara N; Takeuchi T; Toyoda M; Ohtake N; Uemura H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(1):334. PubMed ID: 33317523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physicians' satisfaction with clinical referral laboratories in Rwanda.
Rusanganwa V; Gahutu JB; Hurtig AK; Evander M
Glob Health Action; 2020 Dec; 13(1):1834965. PubMed ID: 33215571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies.
Petkus H; Hoogewerf J; Wyatt JC
Clin Med (Lond); 2020 May; 20(3):324-328. PubMed ID: 32414724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. "Nothing works without the doctor:" Physicians' perception of clinical decision-making and artificial intelligence.
Samhammer D; Roller R; Hummel P; Osmanodja B; Burchardt A; Mayrdorfer M; Duettmann W; Dabrock P
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():1016366. PubMed ID: 36606050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study.
Strauss AT; Sidoti CN; Sung HC; Jain VS; Lehmann H; Purnell TS; Jackson JW; Malinsky D; Hamilton JP; Garonzik-Wang J; Gray SH; Levan ML; Hinson JS; Gurses AP; Gurakar A; Segev DL; Levin S
Hepatol Commun; 2023 Oct; 7(10):. PubMed ID: 37695082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction of Medical Professionals With Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review.
Knop M; Weber S; Mueller M; Niehaves B
JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 9(1):e28639. PubMed ID: 35323118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Responsibility beyond design: Physicians' requirements for ethical medical AI.
Sand M; Durán JM; Jongsma KR
Bioethics; 2022 Feb; 36(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 34089625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. "Just" accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations.
Rueda J; Rodríguez JD; Jounou IP; Hortal-Carmona J; Ausín T; Rodríguez-Arias D
AI Soc; 2022 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 36573157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Roles and Competencies of Doctors in Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Qualitative Analysis Through Physician Interviews.
Tanaka M; Matsumura S; Bito S
JMIR Form Res; 2023 May; 7():e46020. PubMed ID: 37200074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is Artificial Intelligence Customer Service Satisfactory? Insights Based on Microblog Data and User Interviews.
Zhao T; Cui J; Hu J; Dai Y; Zhou Y
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2022 Feb; 25(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 34935458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Artificial Intelligence: its Future and Impact on Acute Medicine.
Schinkel M; Paranjape K; Bhagirath SC; Nanayakkara P
Acute Med; 2023; 22(3):150-153. PubMed ID: 37746684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Investigating the Effect of Paid and Free Feedback About Physicians' Telemedicine Services on Patients' and Physicians' Behaviors: Panel Data Analysis.
Yang H; Zhang X
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12156. PubMed ID: 30900997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficacy of Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Differential-Diagnosis List on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study.
Harada Y; Katsukura S; Kawamura R; Shimizu T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33669930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Toward an Ecologically Valid Conceptual Framework for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings: Need for Systems Thinking, Accountability, Decision-making, Trust, and Patient Safety Considerations in Safeguarding the Technology and Clinicians.
Choudhury A
JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 9(2):e35421. PubMed ID: 35727615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
