These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37257235)

  • 61. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.
    Pashkov VM; Harkusha AO; Harkusha YO
    Wiad Lek; 2020; 73(12 cz 2):2722-2727. PubMed ID: 33611272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Physicians' Perceptions of and Satisfaction With Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Treatment: A Clinical Decision Support System Experience and Implications for Low-Middle-Income Countries.
    Emani S; Rui A; Rocha HAL; Rizvi RF; Juaçaba SF; Jackson GP; Bates DW
    JMIR Cancer; 2022 Apr; 8(2):e31461. PubMed ID: 35389353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A retrospective study on the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support System (AI-CDSS) to improve the incidence of hospital-related venous thromboembolism (VTE).
    Zhou S; Ma X; Jiang S; Huang X; You Y; Shang H; Lu Y
    Ann Transl Med; 2021 Mar; 9(6):491. PubMed ID: 33850888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of AI techniques for prediction of liver fibrosis in hepatitis patients.
    Keltch B; Lin Y; Bayrak C
    J Med Syst; 2014 Aug; 38(8):60. PubMed ID: 24957386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Artificial intelligence's role in vascular surgery decision-making.
    Zarkowsky DS; Stonko DP
    Semin Vasc Surg; 2021 Dec; 34(4):260-267. PubMed ID: 34911632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Factors influencing clinicians' willingness to use an AI-based clinical decision support system.
    Choudhury A
    Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():920662. PubMed ID: 36339516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Are physicians and medical students ready for artificial intelligence applications in healthcare?
    AlZaabi A; AlMaskari S; AalAbdulsalam A
    Digit Health; 2023; 9():20552076231152167. PubMed ID: 36762024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Improvements in Patient Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Survey Study.
    Poncette AS; Mosch L; Spies C; Schmieding M; Schiefenhövel F; Krampe H; Balzer F
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e19091. PubMed ID: 32459655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Enabling pregnant women and their physicians to make informed medication decisions using artificial intelligence.
    Davidson L; Boland MR
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2020 Aug; 47(4):305-318. PubMed ID: 32279157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Physicians' satisfaction with clinical laboratory services at public hospitals in Ethiopia: A national survey.
    Hailu HA; Yalew A; Desale A; Asrat H; Kebede S; Dejene D; Abebe H; Gashu A; Moges B; Yemanebrhane N; Melese D; Ayele BT; Kebede A; Abate E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232178. PubMed ID: 32353001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Liu T; Tsang W; Huang F; Lau OY; Chen Y; Sheng J; Guo Y; Akinwunmi B; Zhang CJ; Ming WK
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Feb; 23(2):e22841. PubMed ID: 33493130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Demystifying artificial intelligence in pharmacy.
    Nelson SD; Walsh CG; Olsen CA; McLaughlin AJ; LeGrand JR; Schutz N; Lasko TA
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2020 Sep; 77(19):1556-1570. PubMed ID: 32620944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care.
    Biller-Andorno N; Ferrario A; Joebges S; Krones T; Massini F; Barth P; Arampatzis G; Krauthammer M
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 48(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 33687916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Inpatient satisfaction with medical information received from caregivers: an observational study on the effect of social deprivation.
    Moret L; Anthoine E; Pourreau A; Beaudeau F; Leclère B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):769. PubMed ID: 29169348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Influence of artificial intelligence on the work design of emergency department clinicians a systematic literature review.
    Boonstra A; Laven M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 May; 22(1):669. PubMed ID: 35585603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Ten Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Primary Care.
    Lin SY; Mahoney MR; Sinsky CA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1626-1630. PubMed ID: 31090027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The inclusion of augmented intelligence in medicine: A framework for successful implementation.
    Bazoukis G; Hall J; Loscalzo J; Antman EM; Fuster V; Armoundas AA
    Cell Rep Med; 2022 Jan; 3(1):100485. PubMed ID: 35106506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Hammer or Measuring Tape? Artificial Intelligence and Justice in Healthcare.
    Heinrichs JH
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 May; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 37190871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care: Content Analysis of Social Media.
    Gao S; He L; Chen Y; Li D; Lai K
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e16649. PubMed ID: 32673231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Artificial intelligence in (gastrointestinal) healthcare: patients' and physicians' perspectives.
    van der Zander QEW; van der Ende-van Loon MCM; Janssen JMM; Winkens B; van der Sommen F; Masclee AAM; Schoon EJ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16779. PubMed ID: 36202957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.