These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37259115)

  • 1. Relevance of hazards in exoskeleton applications: a survey-based enquiry.
    Massardi S; Pinto-Fernandez D; Babič J; Dežman M; Trošt A; Grosu V; Lefeber D; Rodriguez C; Bessler J; Schaake L; Prange-Lasonder G; Veneman JF; Torricelli D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 May; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 37259115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design recommendations for exoskeletons: Perspectives of individuals with spinal cord injury.
    van Silfhout L; Hosman AJF; van de Meent H; Bartels RHMA; Edwards MJR
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2023 Mar; 46(2):256-261. PubMed ID: 34062111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury.
    Lajeunesse V; Vincent C; Routhier F; Careau E; Michaud F
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Oct; 11(7):535-47. PubMed ID: 26340538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Questionnaire results of user experiences with wearable exoskeletons and their preferences for sensory feedback.
    Muijzer-Witteveen H; Sibum N; van Dijsseldonk R; Keijsers N; van Asseldonk E
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 15(1):112. PubMed ID: 30470238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Satisfaction and perceptions of long-term manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury upon completion of a locomotor training program with an overground robotic exoskeleton.
    Gagnon DH; Vermette M; Duclos C; Aubertin-Leheudre M; Ahmed S; Kairy D
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 29256640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Locomotor training using an overground robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with a chronic spinal cord injury living in the community: Lessons learned from a feasibility study in terms of recruitment, attendance, learnability, performance and safety.
    Gagnon DH; Escalona MJ; Vermette M; Carvalho LP; Karelis AD; Duclos C; Aubertin-Leheudre M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 29490678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinician Perceptions of Robotic Exoskeletons for Locomotor Training After Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Approach.
    Ehrlich-Jones L; Crown DS; Kinnett-Hopkins D; Field-Fote E; Furbish C; Mummidisetty CK; Bond RA; Forrest G; Jayaraman A; Heinemann AW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 102(2):203-215. PubMed ID: 33171130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations.
    Kinnett-Hopkins D; Mummidisetty CK; Ehrlich-Jones L; Crown D; Bond RA; Applebaum MH; Jayaraman A; Furbish C; Forrest G; Field-Fote E; Heinemann AW
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 32917287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicentric investigation on the safety, feasibility and usability of the ABLE lower-limb robotic exoskeleton for individuals with spinal cord injury: a framework towards the standardisation of clinical evaluations.
    Wright MA; Herzog F; Mas-Vinyals A; Carnicero-Carmona A; Lobo-Prat J; Hensel C; Franz S; Weidner N; Vidal J; Opisso E; Rupp R
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Apr; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 37046307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technology Acceptance Model for Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation of the Upper Limbs from Therapists' Perspectives.
    Luciani B; Braghin F; Pedrocchi ALG; Gandolla M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exoskeletons for Personal Use After Spinal Cord Injury.
    Kandilakis C; Sasso-Lance E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 102(2):331-337. PubMed ID: 31228407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wearable rehabilitation exoskeletons of the lower limb: analysis of versatility and adaptability.
    Plaza A; Hernandez M; Puyuelo G; Garces E; Garcia E
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 May; 18(4):392-406. PubMed ID: 33332159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voluntary control of wearable robotic exoskeletons by patients with paresis via neuromechanical modeling.
    Durandau G; Farina D; Asín-Prieto G; Dimbwadyo-Terrer I; Lerma-Lara S; Pons JL; Moreno JC; Sartori M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):91. PubMed ID: 31315633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiotherapy students' perspectives on the use and implementation of exoskeletons as a rehabilitative technology in clinical settings.
    Zabel S; Lockhart Z; Badiani N; Cornish J; Falzon L; Flis A; Patterson K; Gregor S; Vaughan-Graham J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Oct; 17(7):840-847. PubMed ID: 32928001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. WHAT ARE USER PERSPECTIVES OF EXOSKELETON TECHNOLOGY? A LITERATURE REVIEW.
    Hill D; Holloway CS; Morgado Ramirez DZ; Smitham P; Pappas Y
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):160-167. PubMed ID: 28849760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design Requirements of Generic Hand Exoskeletons and Survey of Hand Exoskeletons for Rehabilitation, Assistive, or Haptic Use.
    Sarac M; Solazzi M; Frisoli A
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(4):400-413. PubMed ID: 31251193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
    Zhou X; Zheng L
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opportunities and challenges in the development of exoskeletons for locomotor assistance.
    Siviy C; Baker LM; Quinlivan BT; Porciuncula F; Swaminathan K; Awad LN; Walsh CJ
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 7(4):456-472. PubMed ID: 36550303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effectiveness and Safety of Exoskeletons as Assistive and Rehabilitation Devices in the Treatment of Neurologic Gait Disorders in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.
    Fisahn C; Aach M; Jansen O; Moisi M; Mayadev A; Pagarigan KT; Dettori JR; Schildhauer TA
    Global Spine J; 2016 Dec; 6(8):822-841. PubMed ID: 27853668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.