219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37259774)
1. Clinical and radiographic results of crestal vs. subcrestal placement of implants in posterior areas: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sun Y; Yang J; Chen K; Li Z; Chen Z; Huang B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):948-959. PubMed ID: 37259774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around platform-switched implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36-month results from a prospective split-mouth clinical trial.
Al Amri MD; Al-Johany SS; Al Baker AM; Al Rifaiy MQ; Abduljabbar TS; Al-Kheraif AA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1342-1347. PubMed ID: 27743396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.
Lombardo G; Corrocher G; Pighi J; Faccioni F; Rovera A; Marincola M; Nocini PF
Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(11-12):391-402. PubMed ID: 25503340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings.
Gatti C; Gatti F; Silvestri M; Mintrone F; Rossi R; Tridondani G; Piacentini G; Borrelli P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 30025009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Study of the Crestal vs Subcrestal Placement of Dental Implants via Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation.
Chatterjee P; Shashikala R; Navneetham A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):623-627. PubMed ID: 36259302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Linkevicius T; Puisys A; Linkevicius R; Alkimavicius J; Gineviciute E; Linkeviciene L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 32250061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.
Fetner M; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Clozza E; Tovar N; Sarendranath A; Coelho PG; Neiva K; Janal MN; Neiva R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1068-75. PubMed ID: 26394343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal bone changes around platform-switched conical connection implants placed 1 or 2 mm subcrestally: A multicenter crossover randomized controlled trial.
Stacchi C; Lamazza L; Rapani A; Troiano G; Messina M; Antonelli A; Giudice A; Lombardi T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):398-408. PubMed ID: 36725016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: A 5-year randomized clinical trial.
de Siqueira RAC; Savaget Gonçalves Junior R; Dos Santos PGF; de Mattias Sartori IA; Wang HL; Fontão FNGK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Mar; 31(3):282-293. PubMed ID: 31886592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epicrestal and subcrestal placement of platform-switched implants: 18 month-result of a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial.
Froum SJ; Cho SC; Suzuki T; Yu P; Corby P; Khouly I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):353-366. PubMed ID: 29473223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs.
Calvo-Guirado JL; López-López PJ; Mate Sanchez JE; Gargallo Albiol J; Velasco Ortega E; Delgado Ruiz R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 24118345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Valles C; Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Clementini M; Baglivo M; Paniagua B; Nart J
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):555-570. PubMed ID: 29313133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Aimetti M; Ferrarotti F; Mariani GM; Ghelardoni C; Romano F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1369-77. PubMed ID: 26478966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Changes around Platform-Switching Implants Placed in Crestal or Subcrestal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Kütan E; Bolukbasi N; Yildirim-Ondur E; Ozdemir T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e364-75. PubMed ID: 25041252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Apico-Coronal Implant Position Influence Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss? A 36-Month Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial.
Pellicer-Chover H; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Aloy-Prosper A; Canullo L; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 77(3):515-527. PubMed ID: 30529378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Interimplant Distance on Peri-implant Bone and Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes: A Nonrandomized, Prospective, 2-Year Follow-up Study.
Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Lipton D; Lundgren T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):900-8. PubMed ID: 26252042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparison between crestal and subcrestal dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Luna Gomes JM; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):408-417. PubMed ID: 33358610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subcrestal placement of dental implants with an internal conical connection of 0.5 mm versus 1.5 mm: Outcome of a multicentre randomised controlled trial 1 year after loading.
Gualini F; Salina S; Rigotti F; Mazzarini C; Longhin D; Grigoletto M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Sbricoli L; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28327696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.
Huang B; Meng H; Piao M; Xu L; Zhang L; Zhu W
J Periodontol; 2012 Sep; 83(9):1164-71. PubMed ID: 22220773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following endosseous implant placement using flap and flapless techniques in the posterior edentulous areas of the mandible-a randomized controlled trial.
Kumar D; Sivaram G; Shivakumar B; Kumar T
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 29728889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
