These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37260260)

  • 21. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.
    Okada K; Katsuki M; Sharma MD; House CM; Hosken DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140281. PubMed ID: 24807253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Male Violence and Sexual Intimidation in a Wild Primate Society.
    Baniel A; Cowlishaw G; Huchard E
    Curr Biol; 2017 Jul; 27(14):2163-2168.e3. PubMed ID: 28690113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity.
    Rubenstein DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Aug; 274(1620):1895-903. PubMed ID: 17526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance.
    Moore AJ; Gowaty PA; Wallin WG; Moore PJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):517-23. PubMed ID: 11296864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development of affiliative and coercive reproductive tactics in male chimpanzees.
    Reddy RB; Langergraber KE; Sandel AA; Vigilant L; Mitani JC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jan; 288(1942):20202679. PubMed ID: 33402074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mate-choice copying: A fitness-enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection.
    Santos M; Sapage M; Matos M; Varela SAM
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1456-1464. PubMed ID: 28334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin.
    Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. It's Not about Him: Mismeasuring 'Good Genes' in Sexual Selection.
    Achorn AM; Rosenthal GG
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 35(3):206-219. PubMed ID: 31858995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The better, the choosier: A meta-analysis on interindividual variation of male mate choice.
    Pollo P; Nakagawa S; Kasumovic MM
    Ecol Lett; 2022 May; 25(5):1305-1322. PubMed ID: 35259282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The mate choice brain: comparing gene profiles between female choice and male coercive poeciliids.
    Lynch KS; Ramsey ME; Cummings ME
    Genes Brain Behav; 2012 Mar; 11(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 22008245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants.
    Herrmann M; Cahan SH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25355474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.
    Li XY; Holman L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The paradox of obligate sex: The roles of sexual conflict and mate scarcity in transitions to facultative and obligate asexuality.
    Burke NW; Bonduriansky R
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1230-1241. PubMed ID: 31424583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.