These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37260369)

  • 1. A feature and conjunction visual search immersive virtual reality serious game for measuring spatial and distractor inhibition attention using response time and action kinematics.
    Ajana K; Everard G; Lejeune T; Edwards MG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2023 May; 45(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 37260369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving foraging into three dimensions: Feature- versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality.
    Kristjánsson T; Draschkow D; Pálsson Á; Haraldsson D; Jónsson PÖ; Kristjánsson Á
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):313-327. PubMed ID: 32519926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control.
    Petilli MA; Marini F; Daini R
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104129. PubMed ID: 31765925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search.
    Bichot NP; Schall JD
    Vis Neurosci; 1999; 16(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 10022480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring visual search and distraction in immersive virtual reality.
    Olk B; Dinu A; Zielinski DJ; Kopper R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 May; 5(5):172331. PubMed ID: 29892418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.
    Poisson ME; Wilkinson F
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 1528701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.
    Dent K; Allen HA; Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():278. PubMed ID: 22908002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.
    Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Chetverikov A; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104032. PubMed ID: 31476612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a Search Task Using Immersive Virtual Reality: Proof-of-Concept Study.
    Knobel SEJ; Kaufmann BC; Gerber SM; Urwyler P; Cazzoli D; Müri RM; Nef T; Nyffeler T
    JMIR Serious Games; 2021 Jul; 9(3):e29182. PubMed ID: 34255653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down inhibition of search distractors in parallel visual search.
    Müller HJ; von Mühlenen A; Geyer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1373-88. PubMed ID: 18078228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional guidance during visual search among patients with schizophrenia.
    Elahipanah A; Christensen BK; Reingold EM
    Schizophr Res; 2011 Sep; 131(1-3):224-30. PubMed ID: 21741215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks.
    Reavis EA; Frank SM; Greenlee MW; Tse PU
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jun; 37(6):2319-30. PubMed ID: 26970441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.
    Lawrence RK; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Transient structures": the effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches.
    Carrasco M; Ponte D; Rechea C; Sampedro MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Oct; 60(7):1243-58. PubMed ID: 9821785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target-distractor similarity predicts visual search efficiency but only for highly similar features.
    Chapman AF; Störmer VS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Aug; 86(6):1872-1882. PubMed ID: 39251566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.