133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37260649)
1. Comparison of the ease of insertion and complications of the classical method of laryngeal mask airway insertion with an alternative method.
Farbood A; Tayyebi G; Naderi-Boldaji V; Asmarian N
Saudi J Anaesth; 2023; 17(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 37260649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Success rate of airway devices insertion: laryngeal mask airway versus supraglottic gel device.
Pournajafian A; Alimian M; Rokhtabnak F; Ghodraty M; Mojri M
Anesth Pain Med; 2015 Apr; 5(2):e22068. PubMed ID: 25866709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway insertion methods, including the external larynx lift with pre-inflated cuff, on postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications: A randomised clinical trial.
Hu LQ; Leavitt OS; Malwitz C; Kim H; Doty RA; McCarthy RJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Jul; 34(7):448-455. PubMed ID: 28590309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between LMA-Classic and AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation.
Suzanna AB; Liu CY; Rozaidi SW; Ooi JS
Med J Malaysia; 2011 Oct; 66(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 22299547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
Van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier E
Anesthesiology; 2003 Nov; 99(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 14576541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial.
L'Hermite J; Dubout E; Bouvet S; Bracoud LH; Cuvillon P; Coussaye JE; Ripart J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Jul; 34(7):417-424. PubMed ID: 27755181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airways: Laryngeal Mask Airway-classic and Laryngeal Mask Airway-proseal in Children.
Bhat CB; Honnannavar KA; Patil MBP; Mudakanagoudar MS
Anesth Essays Res; 2018; 12(1):119-123. PubMed ID: 29628566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conditions for Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in an Innovative Method vs the Classic Method.
Shetabi H; Shahriari A; Aghadavoudi O
Anesth Pain Med; 2023 Dec; 13(6):e140999. PubMed ID: 38721436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a new visual stylet (Discopo)-guided laryngeal mask airway placement vs conventional blind technique: a prospective randomized study.
Zhao L; Zhang J; Zhou Q; Jiang W
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Dec; 35():85-89. PubMed ID: 27871600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The laryngeal mask airway: a comparison between two insertion techniques.
Wakeling HG; Butler PJ; Baxter PJ
Anesth Analg; 1997 Sep; 85(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 9296432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults.
Ali A; Canturk S; Turkmen A; Turgut N; Altan A
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1010-4. PubMed ID: 19707148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Fullekrug B; Agrò F; Rosenblatt W; Dierdorf SF; Garcia de Lucas E; Capdevilla X; Brimacombe N
Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Comparison Between Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube With Respect to Adequacy of Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia-A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study, and Comparative Study.
Bhushan D; Nandkumar S; Butani M
Asian J Anesthesiol; 2022 Mar; 60():. PubMed ID: 35279972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
Chen MK; Hsu HT; Lu IC; Shih CK; Shen YC; Tseng KY; Cheng KI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of I-gel with Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Regarding the Ease of Use and Clinical Performance.
Arı DE; Ar AY; Karip CŞ; Siyahkoç İ; Arslan AH; Akgün FN
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2015 Oct; 43(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 27366518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness between the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) and the laryngeal mask airway by novice personnel.
Oh SK; Lim BG; Kim H; Lim SH
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2012 Aug; 63(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 22949981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery.
Gill RK; Tarat A; Pathak D; Dutta S
Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28298751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
