These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Presurgical Djaïleb L; Armstrong WR; Thompson D; Gafita A; Farolfi A; Rajagopal A; Grogan TR; Nguyen K; Benz MR; Hotta M; Barbato F; Ceci F; Schwarzenböck SM; Unterrainer M; Zacho HD; Juarez R; Cooperberg M; Carroll P; Washington S; Reiter RE; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Czernin J; Hope TA; Calais J Eur Urol; 2023 Dec; 84(6):588-596. PubMed ID: 37482512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. Hope TA; Eiber M; Armstrong WR; Juarez R; Murthy V; Lawhn-Heath C; Behr SC; Zhang L; Barbato F; Ceci F; Farolfi A; Schwarzenböck SM; Unterrainer M; Zacho HD; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR; Reiter RE; Holden S; Herrmann K; Zhu S; Fendler WP; Czernin J; Calais J JAMA Oncol; 2021 Nov; 7(11):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 34529005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Briganti A; Abdollah F; Nini A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni NM; Salonia A; Colombo R; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2012 Jun; 61(6):1132-8. PubMed ID: 22099610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Rational use of Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT according to nomograms and risk groups for the detection of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. Madendere S; Kılıç M; Köseoğlu E; Aykanat İC; Eden AB; Coşkun B; Tekkalan FB; Balbay MD Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):29.e9-29.e15. PubMed ID: 38114351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer. van Leeuwen PJ; Emmett L; Ho B; Delprado W; Ting F; Nguyen Q; Stricker PD BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 27207581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography? Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Indications for and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: accuracy of available nomograms for the prediction of lymph node invasion. Oderda M; Diamand R; Albisinni S; Calleris G; Carbone A; Falcone M; Fiard G; Gandaglia G; Marquis A; Marra G; Parola C; Pastore A; Peltier A; Ploussard G; Roumeguère T; Sanchez-Salas R; Simone G; Smelzo S; Witt JH; Gontero P BJU Int; 2021 Mar; 127(3):318-325. PubMed ID: 32869940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI in regard to local staging for prostate cancer with histopathological results: A retrospective study. Ucar T; Gunduz N; Demirci E; Culpan M; Gunel H; Kir G; Atis RG; Yildirim A Prostate; 2022 Nov; 82(15):1462-1468. PubMed ID: 35915579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer. Barbosa ÁRG; Amaral BS; Lourenço DB; Bianco B; Gushiken FA; Apezzato M; Silva JF; Cunha MLD; Filippi RZ; Baroni RH; Lemos GC; Carneiro A Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2022; 20():eAO6599. PubMed ID: 35584444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Predicting early outcomes in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Meijer D; van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk ML; Boellaard TN; Schoots IG; van der Poel HG; Hendrikse HN; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN BJU Int; 2022 Jan; 129(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34028165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model to predict pelvic lymph node invasion for patients with prostate cancer. Zheng H; Miao Q; Liu Y; Mirak SA; Hosseiny M; Scalzo F; Raman SS; Sung K Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5688-5699. PubMed ID: 35238971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of Ga-PSMA PET MRI with mpMRI in localization and regional staging of prostate cancer. Deka H; Pooleri GK; Suguna B; Rajeshkannan R; Sekhar R; Bindhu MR; Prasad V World J Urol; 2024 Mar; 42(1):153. PubMed ID: 38483621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Simultaneous Eiber M; Weirich G; Holzapfel K; Souvatzoglou M; Haller B; Rauscher I; Beer AJ; Wester HJ; Gschwend J; Schwaiger M; Maurer T Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):829-836. PubMed ID: 26795686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]