These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37261504)

  • 1. Postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus LLIF for adjacent segment disease.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jul; 165(7):1907-1914. PubMed ID: 37261504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Massel DH; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 36637505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Parsons AW; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1196-e1207. PubMed ID: 36075356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Severe Comorbidity Burden Does Not Influence Postoperative Clinical Outcomes and Trajectory for Back Pain, Leg Pain, Physical Function, or Disability in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Park GJ; Collins AP; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e157-e168. PubMed ID: 35470080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; 37(5):E179-E184. PubMed ID: 38178316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Nov; 30(21):e1382-e1390. PubMed ID: 36264190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Oyetayo OO; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e251-e267. PubMed ID: 35948231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Jacob KC; Patel MR; Vanjani NN; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1208-e1218. PubMed ID: 36075354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Singh K
    Neurosurgery; 2023 Jun; 92(6):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 36625578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-level TLIF Versus LLIF at L4-5: A Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes and Recovery Ratios.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Prabhu MC; Pawlowski H; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Feb; 30(4):e495-e505. PubMed ID: 34921548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 166():e599-e606. PubMed ID: 35863643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF.
    Otsuki B; Fujibayashi S; Shimizu T; Murata K; Masuda S; Matsuda S
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3200-3209. PubMed ID: 37314580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value in preoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental Component score on clinical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Roca AM; Anwar FN; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Medakkar SS; Loya AC; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Federico VP; Lopez GD; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    J Clin Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 125():12-16. PubMed ID: 38733898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF: 2-Year Follow-up.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Sayari AJ; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Mohan S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):E1516-E1522. PubMed ID: 32756287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.