147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37263771)
1. How to debunk misinformation? An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats.
Kotz J; Giese H; König LM
Br J Health Psychol; 2023 Nov; 28(4):1097-1112. PubMed ID: 37263771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication.
Kessler SH; Bachmann E
Z Gesundh Wiss; 2022; 30(8):1823-1835. PubMed ID: 35070640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
Mourali M; Drake C
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Promoting COVID-19 vaccine confidence through public responses to misinformation: The joint influence of message source and message content.
Wood RM; Juanchich M; Ramirez M; Zhang S
Soc Sci Med; 2023 May; 324():115863. PubMed ID: 37030097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The differential effects of a governmental debunking campaign concerning COVID-19 vaccination misinformation.
Helfers A; Ebersbach M
J Commun Healthc; 2023 Mar; 16(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 36919806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.
Chan MS; Jones CR; Hall Jamieson K; Albarracín D
Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1531-1546. PubMed ID: 28895452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public sector's misinformation debunking during the public health campaign: a case of Hong Kong.
Zhu R; Zhang X
Health Promot Int; 2023 Jun; 38(3):. PubMed ID: 37279470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Debunking nutrition myths: An experimental test of the 'truth sandwich' text format.
König LM
Br J Health Psychol; 2023 Nov; 28(4):1000-1010. PubMed ID: 37186138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a template for countering misinformation-Real-world Autism treatment myth debunking.
Paynter J; Luskin-Saxby S; Keen D; Fordyce K; Frost G; Imms C; Miller S; Trembath D; Tucker M; Ecker U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210746. PubMed ID: 30699155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial.
Yousuf H; van der Linden S; Bredius L; Ted van Essen GA; Sweep G; Preminger Z; van Gorp E; Scherder E; Narula J; Hofstra L
EClinicalMedicine; 2021 May; 35():100881. PubMed ID: 34124631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of communication interventions for countering vaccine misinformation.
Whitehead HS; French CE; Caldwell DM; Letley L; Mounier-Jack S
Vaccine; 2023 Jan; 41(5):1018-1034. PubMed ID: 36628653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. COVID-19 myth-busting: an experimental study.
Challenger A; Sumner P; Bott L
BMC Public Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):131. PubMed ID: 35045852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collateral damage from debunking mRNA vaccine misinformation.
Krause NM; Beets B; Howell EL; Tosteson H; Scheufele DA
Vaccine; 2023 Jan; 41(4):922-929. PubMed ID: 36682880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction format has a limited role when debunking misinformation.
Swire-Thompson B; Cook J; Butler LH; Sanderson JA; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Dec; 6(1):83. PubMed ID: 34964924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing Myths and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Randomized Trial.
Steffens MS; Dunn AG; Marques MD; Danchin M; Witteman HO; Leask J
Pediatrics; 2021 Nov; 148(5):. PubMed ID: 34635584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Prevalence, Features, Influencing Factors, and Solutions for COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation: Systematic Review.
Zhao S; Hu S; Zhou X; Song S; Wang Q; Zheng H; Zhang Y; Hou Z
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2023 Jan; 9():e40201. PubMed ID: 36469911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.
Tay LQ; Hurlstone MJ; Kurz T; Ecker UKH
Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):591-607. PubMed ID: 34967004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hope over fear: The interplay between threat information and hope appeal corrections in debunking early COVID-19 misinformation.
Tao R; Li J; Shen L; Yang S
Soc Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 333():116132. PubMed ID: 37556993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A
Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
