131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37264209)
1. Researchers and regulators plan for a future without lab animals.
Moutinho S
Nat Med; 2023 Sep; 29(9):2151-2154. PubMed ID: 37264209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of animals on expiring protocols. Plan ahead.
Gillett CS
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Oct; 38(10):318. PubMed ID: 19773772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lords support animal experiments but call for alternatives.
Dobson R
BMJ; 2002 Aug; 325(7358):238. PubMed ID: 12153916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lords blast red tape in animal experiments.
McDowell N
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6896):358. PubMed ID: 12140524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory vector models in regard to animal protection legislation.
Lonc E; Mizgajska H; Hildebrand J
Wiad Parazytol; 1999; 45(4):563-4. PubMed ID: 16889011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. law and animal experimentation: a critical primer.
Latham SR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; Suppl():S35-9. PubMed ID: 23138429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revisiting approved protocols.
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Jun; 39(6):165. PubMed ID: 20485350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting approval protocols: approval should stand.
Williams MK
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Jun; 39(6):165-6. PubMed ID: 20485349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of animals on expiring protocols.
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Oct; 38(10):317. PubMed ID: 19773770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Amendments for additional animals: addition is significant.
Zyry DM; Gunnels RD
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Aug; 38(8):256. PubMed ID: 19626015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Amendments for additional animals: not a minor amendment.
Jordán J; Andrutis K
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Aug; 38(8):255-6. PubMed ID: 19626012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting approval protocols: re-review not required.
Yamada KP; Prestia K; Dholakia U; Shoulson R
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Jun; 39(6):166. PubMed ID: 20485352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of animals on expiring protocols. Transferring animals responsibly.
Heenan TM; Keys M
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Oct; 38(10):317-8. PubMed ID: 19773769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breeding without research. Letter versus intent.
Overhulse KA; Nelson E
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Feb; 39(2):35. PubMed ID: 20090690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Revisiting approved protocols: IACUC should discuss.
Bell JH; Scorpio D
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Jun; 39(6):166-7. PubMed ID: 20485351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of animals on expiring protocols. No 'ongoing' work.
Amato J; Kittleson A; Peters J; Pecukonis A; Goodman L; Silvius D
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Oct; 38(10):318. PubMed ID: 19773771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. EMALT: a Brazilian Meeting on Alternative Methods to Animal Use for Regulatory Purposes.
Presgrave OA; Bhogal N
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Dec; 33(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 16419364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Replacement of animals in research will never be possible.
Caminiti R
Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7226):147. PubMed ID: 19129827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Government sets out plans to advance the use of the 3Rs.
Vet Rec; 2014 Feb; 174(7):158. PubMed ID: 24526532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisiting approach protocols: a word from OLAW and USDA.
Brown P; Gipson C
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Jun; 39(6):167. PubMed ID: 20485353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
