146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37265440)
1. Analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Robotic Hepatectomy Applying the Western-Model Southampton Laparoscopic Difficulty Scoring System. An Experience From a Tertiary US Hepatobiliary Center.
Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Goodwin S; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2023 Sep; 89(9):3788-3793. PubMed ID: 37265440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection.
Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Sep; 25(9):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 37217370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.
Ricker AB; Davis JM; Motz BM; Watson M; Beckman M; Driedger M; Martinie JB; Vrochides D
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7288-7294. PubMed ID: 37558825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tampa Difficulty Score: a novel scoring system for difficulty of robotic hepatectomy.
Sucandy I; Dugan MM; Ross SB; Syblis C; Crespo K; Kenary PY; Rosemurgy A
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; 28(5):685-693. PubMed ID: 38462424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 10 years, 100 robotic major hepatectomies: a single-center experience.
McCarron F; Cochran A; Ricker A; Mantha R; Driedger M; Beckman M; Vrochides D; Martinie J
Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):902-907. PubMed ID: 37845533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.
Tsung A; Geller DA; Sukato DC; Sabbaghian S; Tohme S; Steel J; Marsh W; Reddy SK; Bartlett DL
Ann Surg; 2014 Mar; 259(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 24045442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies.
Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY
HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience of 629 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Liver Resections.
Winckelmans T; Wicherts DA; Parmentier I; De Meyere C; Verslype C; D'Hondt M
World J Surg; 2023 Sep; 47(9):2241-2249. PubMed ID: 37208537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy.
Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2024 Mar; ():31348241241616. PubMed ID: 38520138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Single Institution's Experience With Robotic Minor and Major Hepatectomy.
Sucandy I; Jacoby H; Crespo K; Syblis C; App S; Ignatius J; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1387-1391. PubMed ID: 34798777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applying IWATE criteria to robotic hepatectomy: is there a "robotic effect"?
Luberice K; Sucandy I; Modasi A; Castro M; Krill E; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Jun; 23(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 33144052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.
Goh BKP; Lee SY; Teo JY; Kam JH; Jeyaraj PR; Cheow PC; Chow PKH; Ooi LLPJ; Chung AYF; Chan CY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4658-4665. PubMed ID: 29967997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional First 100 Case Experience and Outcomes of Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors.
Sucandy I; Giovannetti A; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2020 Mar; 86(3):200-207. PubMed ID: 32223798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hepatectomy: initial experience of a single institution in Singapore.
Kam JH; Goh BK; Chan CY; Wong JS; Lee SY; Cheow PC; Chung AY; Ooi LL
Singapore Med J; 2016 Apr; 57(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 26843059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: Multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores.
Cipriani F; Fiorentini G; Magistri P; Fontani A; Menonna F; Annecchiarico M; Lauterio A; De Carlis L; Coratti A; Boggi U; Ceccarelli G; Di Benedetto F; Aldrighetti L
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1108-1123. PubMed ID: 34291591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcomes from a single institution.
Liu L; Wang Y; Wu T; Lin J; Deng L; Jiang J; An T
BMC Surg; 2022 Dec; 22(1):432. PubMed ID: 36528768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections.
Labadie KP; Droullard DJ; Lois AW; Daniel SK; McNevin KE; Gonzalez JV; Seo YD; Sullivan KM; Bilodeau KS; Dickerson LK; Utria AF; Calhoun J; Pillarisetty VG; Sham JG; Yeung RS; Park JO
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):889-895. PubMed ID: 33608766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Major robotic hepatectomies: technical considerations.
Magistri P; Assirati G; Ballarin R; Di Sandro S; Di Benedetto F
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):989-997. PubMed ID: 33411220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and efficacy of synchronous robotic surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases.
Dwyer RH; Scheidt MJ; Marshall JS; Tsoraides SS
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29704203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Major hepatectomy in elderly patients: possible benefit from robotic platform utilization.
Yoshino O; Wang Y; McCarron F; Motz B; Wang H; Baker E; Iannitti D; Martinie JB; Vrochides D
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6228-6234. PubMed ID: 37173594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
