These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37266860)

  • 1. Development of a 2D-QSAR Model for Tissue-to-Plasma Partition Coefficient Value with High Accuracy Using Machine Learning Method, Minimum Required Experimental Values, and Physicochemical Descriptors.
    Handa K; Sakamoto S; Kageyama M; Iijima T
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2023 Jul; 48(4):341-352. PubMed ID: 37266860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of Novel Methods for QSAR Modeling by Machine Learning Repeatedly: A Case Study on Drug Distribution to Each Tissue.
    Handa K; Yoshimura S; Kageyama M; Iijima T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3662-3669. PubMed ID: 38639496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QSAR model to predict K
    Umemori Y; Handa K; Sakamoto S; Kageyama M; Iijima T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2022 Nov; 33(11):885-897. PubMed ID: 36420623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Prediction Accuracy for Volume of Distribution in Rat and Human Using In Vitro, In Vivo, PBPK and QSAR Methods.
    Mathew S; Tess D; Burchett W; Chang G; Woody N; Keefer C; Orozco C; Lin J; Jordan S; Yamazaki S; Jones R; Di L
    J Pharm Sci; 2021 Apr; 110(4):1799-1823. PubMed ID: 33338491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a decision tree to classify the most accurate tissue-specific tissue to plasma partition coefficient algorithm for a given compound.
    Yun YE; Cotton CA; Edginton AN
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Feb; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24258064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate prediction of K
    Ma Y; Jiang M; Javeria H; Tian D; Du Z
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24304. PubMed ID: 38298681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Machine Learning-Based QSAR Model for Benzimidazole Derivatives as Corrosion Inhibitors by Incorporating Comprehensive Feature Selection.
    Liu Y; Guo Y; Wu W; Xiong Y; Sun C; Yuan L; Li M
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Dec; 11(4):738-747. PubMed ID: 31486019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating in Silico and in Vitro Approaches To Predict Drug Accessibility to the Central Nervous System.
    Zhang YY; Liu H; Summerfield SG; Luscombe CN; Sahi J
    Mol Pharm; 2016 May; 13(5):1540-50. PubMed ID: 27015243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction and lumping of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: prediction of the disposition of fentanyl and pethidine in humans by successively simplified models.
    Björkman S
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2003 Aug; 30(4):285-307. PubMed ID: 14650375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of Tissue to Plasma Concentration Ratios of Drugs in the Rat from Experimentally Estimated Volume of Distribution: Application of Allometry.
    Mahmood I
    Curr Drug Metab; 2018; 19(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 29189141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of Oral Pharmacokinetics Using a Combination of In Silico Descriptors and In Vitro ADME Properties.
    Kosugi Y; Hosea N
    Mol Pharm; 2021 Mar; 18(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 33512165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation-based prediction of tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients using readily available input parameters.
    Yun YE; Edginton AN
    Xenobiotica; 2013 Oct; 43(10):839-52. PubMed ID: 23418669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive QSAR modeling of CCR5 antagonist piperidine derivatives using chemometric tools.
    Roy K; Mandal AS
    J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem; 2009 Feb; 24(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18608745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ARKA: a framework of dimensionality reduction for machine-learning classification modeling, risk assessment, and data gap-filling of sparse environmental toxicity data.
    Banerjee A; Roy K
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2024 Jun; 26(6):991-1007. PubMed ID: 38743054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of the Impact of Partition Coefficient Prediction Methods on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Output Using a Standardized Tissue Composition.
    Utsey K; Gastonguay MS; Russell S; Freling R; Riggs MM; Elmokadem A
    Drug Metab Dispos; 2020 Oct; 48(10):903-916. PubMed ID: 32665416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consideration of Fractional Distribution Parameter f
    Jeong YS; Jusko WJ
    Pharm Res; 2022 Mar; 39(3):463-479. PubMed ID: 35288804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of Compound Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles in Mice Using Random Forest.
    Handa K; Wright P; Yoshimura S; Kageyama M; Iijima T; Bender A
    Mol Pharm; 2023 Jun; 20(6):3060-3072. PubMed ID: 37096989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a read-across-derived classification model for the predictions of mutagenicity data and its comparison with traditional QSAR models and expert systems.
    Pandey SK; Roy K
    Toxicology; 2023 Dec; 500():153676. PubMed ID: 37993082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Li X; Jusko WJ
    Drug Metab Dispos; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36195337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeled Rat Hepatic and Plasma Concentrations of Chemicals after Virtual Administrations Using Two Sets of in Silico Liver-to-Plasma Partition Coefficients.
    Adachi K; Utsumi M; Sato T; Nakano H; Shimizu M; Yamazaki H
    Biol Pharm Bull; 2023 Sep; 46(9):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 37380443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.