These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37267008)

  • 1. Modeling driver behavior in critical traffic scenarios for the safety assessment of automated driving.
    Fries A; Lemberg L; Fahrenkrog F; Mai M; Das A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S105-S110. PubMed ID: 37267008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Waymo simulated driving behavior in reconstructed fatal crashes within an autonomous vehicle operating domain.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Daniel T; Alderson C; Ogle A; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106454. PubMed ID: 34700249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.
    Oh H; Yun Y; Myung R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 38252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the safety criticality of driver behavior toward cyclists at intersections.
    Gohl I; Schneider A; Nitsch V
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup3):45-50. PubMed ID: 31951744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of near-collision driver behavior models.
    Markkula G; Benderius O; Wolff K; Wahde M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):1117-43. PubMed ID: 23397819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-agent traffic simulations to estimate the impact of automated technologies on safety.
    Kitajima S; Shimono K; Tajima J; Antona-Makoshi J; Uchida N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S58-S64. PubMed ID: 31381431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of bus drivers reaction to simulated traffic collision situations - eye-tracking studies.
    Bortkiewicz A; Gadzicka E; Siedlecka J; Kosobudzki M; Dania M; Szymczak W; Jóźwiak Z; Szyjkowska A; Viebig P; Pas-Wyroślak A; Makowiec-Dąbrowska T; Kapitaniak B; Hickman JS
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 32(2):161-174. PubMed ID: 30575822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational modeling of driver pre-crash brake response, with and without off-road glances: Parameterization using real-world crashes and near-crashes.
    Svärd M; Markkula G; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106433. PubMed ID: 34673380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving.
    Yang B; Saito T; Wang Z; Kitazaki S; Nakano K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(6):475-481. PubMed ID: 37339499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.