These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37267133)

  • 1. Blind Image Quality Assessment for Pathological Microscopic Image Under Screen and Immersion Scenarios.
    Guo Y; Hu M; Min X; Wang Y; Dai M; Zhai G; Zhang XP; Yang X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 42(11):3295-3306. PubMed ID: 37267133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Entropy Based Data Expansion Method for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Guan X; He L; Li M; Li F
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33285835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blind Quality Assessment of Images Containing Objects of Interest.
    He W; Luo Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 37837037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cubemap-Based Perception-Driven Blind Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images.
    Jiang H; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Peng Z; Chen F; Zhang Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():2364-2377. PubMed ID: 33481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Shen Y; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4270-81. PubMed ID: 25122572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Zhang W; Li D; Ma C; Zhai G; Yang X; Ma K
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Mar; 45(3):2864-2878. PubMed ID: 35635807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image Quality Assessment Using Contrastive Learning.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4149-4161. PubMed ID: 35700254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalised deep meta-learning model for automated quality control of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images.
    Nabavi S; Simchi H; Moghaddam ME; Abin AA; Frangi AF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107770. PubMed ID: 37714020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction on Pathological Images with Discriminative Patch Selection and Multi-Instance Learning.
    Liu H; Xu WD; Shang ZH; Wang XD; Zhou HY; Ma KW; Zhou H; Qi JL; Jiang JR; Tan LL; Zeng HM; Cai HJ; Wang KS; Qian YL
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():858453. PubMed ID: 35494021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No-Reference Quality Metric of Contrast-Distorted Images Based on Information Maximization.
    Gu K; Lin W; Zhai G; Yang X; Zhang W; Chen CW
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Dec; 47(12):4559-4565. PubMed ID: 27323391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NITS-IQA Database: A New Image Quality Assessment Database.
    Ruikar J; Chaudhury S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of out-of-focus microscopic images by deep learning.
    Zhang C; Jiang H; Liu W; Li J; Tang S; Juhas M; Zhang Y
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2022; 20():1957-1966. PubMed ID: 35521557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conv-Former: A Novel Network Combining Convolution and Self-Attention for Image Quality Assessment.
    Han L; Lv H; Zhao Y; Liu H; Bi G; Yin Z; Fang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36617024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Data.
    Gu K; Tao D; Qiao JF; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2018 Apr; 29(4):1301-1313. PubMed ID: 28287984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confusing Image Quality Assessment: Toward Better Augmented Reality Experience.
    Duan H; Min X; Zhu Y; Zhai G; Yang X; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():7206-7221. PubMed ID: 36367913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A deep metric learning approach for histopathological image retrieval.
    Yang P; Zhai Y; Li L; Lv H; Wang J; Zhu C; Jiang R
    Methods; 2020 Jul; 179():14-25. PubMed ID: 32439386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.