These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37267372)

  • 1. Metamnemonic predictions of lineup identification.
    McKinley GL; Benjamin AS; Gronlund SD
    Memory; 2023 Sep; 31(8):1019-1038. PubMed ID: 37267372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.
    Baldassari MJ; Moore KN; Hyman IE; Hope L; Mah EY; Lindsay DS; Mansour J; Saraiva R; Horry R; Rath H; Kelly L; Jones R; Vale S; Lawson B; Pedretti J; Palma TA; Cruz F; Quarenta J; Van der Cruyssen I; Mileva M; Allen J; Jeye B; Wiechert S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Feb; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 36854842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perpetrator pose reinstatement during a lineup test increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Seale-Carlisle TM; Karoğlu N; Rockey JC; Smith HMJ; Smith L; Maltby J; Yaremenko S; Flowe HD
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13830. PubMed ID: 34244529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lineup identification in young and older witnesses: does describing the criminal help or hinder?
    Holdstock JS; Dalton P; May KA; Boogert S; Mickes L
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jun; 7(1):51. PubMed ID: 35713818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does anyone else look familiar? Influencing identification decisions by asking witnesses to re-examine the lineup.
    Eisen ML; Cedré GC; Williams TQ; Jones JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):306-320. PubMed ID: 29939064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test a Witness's Memory of a Suspect Only Once.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL; Loftus EF; Garrett BL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2021 Dec; 22(1_suppl):1S-18S. PubMed ID: 34730037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eyewitness memory in the news can affect the strategic regulation of memory reporting.
    Butt MM; Colloff MF; Magner E; Flowe HD
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):763-774. PubMed ID: 33258419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance.
    Saraiva RB; Hope L; Horselenberg R; Ost J; Sauer JD; van Koppen PJ
    Memory; 2020 Jan; 28(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 31699019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
    Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Child witness expressions of certainty are informative.
    Winsor AA; Flowe HD; Seale-Carlisle TM; Killeen IM; Hett D; Jores T; Ingham M; Lee BP; Stevens LM; Colloff MF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Nov; 150(11):2387-2407. PubMed ID: 34498905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
    Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Jena Eyewitness Research Stimuli (JERS): A database of mock theft videos involving two perpetrators, presented in 2D and VR formats with corresponding 2D and 3D lineup images.
    Kruse U; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295033. PubMed ID: 38091269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.
    Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.