These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37267542)

  • 1. Modeling Explosive Opinion Depolarization in Interdependent Topics.
    Ojer J; Starnini M; Pastor-Satorras R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 May; 130(20):207401. PubMed ID: 37267542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zealots in multistate noisy voter models.
    Khalil N; Galla T
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012311. PubMed ID: 33601527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explosive transitions induced by interdependent contagion-consensus dynamics in multiplex networks.
    Soriano-Paños D; Guo Q; Latora V; Gómez-Gardeñes J
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Jun; 99(6-1):062311. PubMed ID: 31330755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social Depolarization and Diversity of Opinions-Unified ABM Framework.
    Sobkowicz P
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Mar; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 37190355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does political discussion frequency impact political moral opinions? The moral argument theory of opinion dynamics.
    Eriksson K; Vartanova I; Strimling P
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():915252. PubMed ID: 36118441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in social interactions and emergence of extremism in complex social networks.
    Nguyen VX; Xiao G; Zhou J; Li G; Li B
    Chaos; 2020 Oct; 30(10):103110. PubMed ID: 33138463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonlinear q-voter model with inflexible zealots.
    Mobilia M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(1):012803. PubMed ID: 26274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opinion dynamics in social networks under competition: the role of influencing factors in consensus-reaching.
    Lang N; Wang L; Zha Q
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 May; 9(5):211732. PubMed ID: 35620005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.
    Baumann F; Lorenz-Spreen P; Sokolov IM; Starnini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jan; 124(4):048301. PubMed ID: 32058741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Zealotry effects on opinion dynamics in the adaptive voter model.
    Klamser PP; Wiedermann M; Donges JF; Donner RV
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Nov; 96(5-1):052315. PubMed ID: 29347768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating political polarization in India through the lens of Twitter.
    Borah A; Singh SR
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):97. PubMed ID: 35937771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Zealots in the mean-field noisy voter model.
    Khalil N; San Miguel M; Toral R
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012310. PubMed ID: 29448335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attraction by pairwise coherence explains the emergence of ideological sorting.
    Zimmerman F; Pedraza L; Navajas J; Balenzuela P
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 Jul; 3(7):pgae263. PubMed ID: 39081784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depolarization of opinions on social networks through random nudges.
    Pal R; Kumar A; Santhanam MS
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Sep; 108(3-1):034307. PubMed ID: 37849173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of zealotry in high-dimensional opinion dynamics models.
    Waagen A; Verma G; Chan K; Swami A; D'Souza R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Feb; 91(2):022811. PubMed ID: 25768556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling Multidimensional Public Opinion Polarization Process under the Context of Derived Topics.
    Chen T; Wang Y; Yang J; Cong G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33430091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competing opinion diffusion on social networks.
    Hu H
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Nov; 4(11):171160. PubMed ID: 29291101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ideology, communication and polarization.
    Kashima Y; Perfors A; Ferdinand V; Pattenden E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200133. PubMed ID: 33612005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Undecided Have the Key: Interaction-Driven Opinion Dynamics in a Three State Model.
    Balenzuela P; Pinasco JP; Semeshenko V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139572. PubMed ID: 26436421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polarized Ukraine 2014: opinion and territorial split demonstrated with the bounded confidence XY model, parametrized by Twitter data.
    Romenskyy M; Spaiser V; Ihle T; Lobaskin V
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Aug; 5(8):171935. PubMed ID: 30224983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.