BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3726766)

  • 1. Resident and faculty differences in student evaluations: implications for changes in a clerkship grading system.
    Carline JD; Cook CE; Lennard ES; Siever M; Coluccio GM; Norman NL
    Surgery; 1986 Jul; 100(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 3726766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.
    Goldstein SD; Lindeman B; Colbert-Getz J; Arbella T; Dudas R; Lidor A; Sacks B
    Am J Surg; 2014 Feb; 207(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24239528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. General surgery versus specialty rotations: a new paradigm in surgery clerkships.
    Sandquist MK; Way DP; Patterson AF; Caniano DA; Arnold MW; Nwomeh BC
    J Surg Res; 2009 May; 153(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 18674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlating surgical clerkship evaluations with performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners examination.
    Reid CM; Kim DY; Mandel J; Smith A; Bansal V
    J Surg Res; 2014 Jul; 190(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 24666987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitfalls in evaluating the surgical student.
    Stillman RM
    Surgery; 1984 Jul; 96(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6740500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ward evaluations: should they be abandoned?
    Kwolek CJ; Donnelly MB; Sloan DA; Birrell SN; Strodel WE; Schwartz RW
    J Surg Res; 1997 Apr; 69(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9202638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contributions of surgical residents to patient satisfaction: impact of residents beyond clinical care.
    Resnick AS; Disbot M; Wurster A; Mullen JL; Kaiser LR; Morris JB
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18571141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral examinations: actual and perceived contributions to surgery clerkship performance.
    Zelenock GB; Calhoun JG; Hockman EM; Youmans LC; Erlandson EE; Davis WK; Turcotte JG
    Surgery; 1985 Jun; 97(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 4002121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do strong resident teachers help medical students on objective examinations of knowledge?
    Langenfeld SJ; Helmer SD; Cusick TE; Smith RS
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 21821211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American Board of Surgery examinations: can we identify surgery residency applicants and residents who will pass the examinations on the first attempt?
    Shellito JL; Osland JS; Helmer SD; Chang FC
    Am J Surg; 2010 Feb; 199(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 19892313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the National Board of Medical Examiners' Surgery Subtest level the playing field?
    Hermanson B; Firpo M; Cochran A; Neumayer L
    Am J Surg; 2004 Nov; 188(5):520-1. PubMed ID: 15546562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in faculty evaluations of clerkship students attributable to surgical service.
    Plymale MA; French J; Donnelly MB; Iocono J; Pulito AR
    J Surg Educ; 2010; 67(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 20630430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it appropriate to use core clerkship grades in the selection of residents?
    Takayama H; Grinsell R; Brock D; Foy H; Pellegrini C; Horvath K
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17084767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of medical student fund of knowledge in surgery.
    Lawrence PF; Nelson EW; Cockayne TW
    Surgery; 1985 Jun; 97(6):745-9. PubMed ID: 4002122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of faculty and resident global assessment of medical students' clinical knowledge during their pediatrics clerkship.
    Dudas RA; Colbert JM; Goldstein S; Barone MA
    Acad Pediatr; 2012; 12(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 22056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concordance of surgical clerkship performance and National Board of Medical Examiners Part II subtest scores. A validation model.
    Benenson TF; Stimmel B; Aufses A
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 7245030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing senior residents' knowledge and performance: an integrated evaluation program.
    Schwartz RW; Donnelly MB; Sloan DA; Johnson SB; Strodel WE
    Surgery; 1994 Oct; 116(4):634-7; discussion 637-40. PubMed ID: 7940160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors in faculty evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Pulito AR; Donnelly MB; Plymale M
    Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):667-75. PubMed ID: 17614887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of physician ratings in the assessment of student clinical performance in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
    Metheny WP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jul; 78(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 2047054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.