196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37268062)
1. The Significance of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Grading in Microsatellite Instability-High and POLE-Mutant Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma.
Kertowidjojo E; Momeni-Boroujeni A; Rios-Doria E; Abu-Rustum N; Soslow RA
Mod Pathol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):100234. PubMed ID: 37268062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcomes of patients with POLE mutated endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Stasenko M; Tunnage I; Ashley CW; Rubinstein MM; Latham AJ; Da Cruz Paula A; Mueller JJ; Leitao MM; Friedman CF; Makker V; Soslow RA; DeLair DF; Hyman DM; Zamarin D; Alektiar KM; Aghajanian CA; Abu-Rustum NR; Weigelt B; Cadoo KA
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 156(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 31757464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Genomic Heterogeneity of FIGO Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinoma Impacts Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.
Hussein YR; Broaddus R; Weigelt B; Levine DA; Soslow RA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 Jan; 35(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 26166718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Application and clinical significance of TCGA molecular classification in endometrial cancer].
Zhao LY; Dai YB; Li LW; Wang ZQ; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 56(10):697-704. PubMed ID: 34823319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
Soslow RA; Tornos C; Park KJ; Malpica A; Matias-Guiu X; Oliva E; Parkash V; Carlson J; McCluggage WG; Gilks CB
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 Jan; 38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S64-S74. PubMed ID: 30550484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polymerase Epsilon Exonuclease Domain Mutations in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma.
Hoang LN; McConechy MK; Köbel M; Anglesio M; Senz J; Maassen M; Kommoss S; Meng B; Postovit L; Kelemen LE; Staebler A; Brucker S; Krämer B; McAlpine JN; Gilks CB; Huntsman DG; Lee CH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Sep; 25(7):1187-93. PubMed ID: 26166557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immune checkpoint expression, microsatellite instability, and mutational burden: Identifying immune biomarker phenotypes in uterine cancer.
Jones NL; Xiu J; Rocconi RP; Herzog TJ; Winer IS
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 156(2):393-399. PubMed ID: 31882243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microsatellite instability and epigenetic inactivation of MLH1 and outcome of patients with endometrial carcinomas of the endometrioid type.
Zighelboim I; Goodfellow PJ; Gao F; Gibb RK; Powell MA; Rader JS; Mutch DG
J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 25(15):2042-8. PubMed ID: 17513808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microcystic, elongated, and fragmented pattern invasion is mainly associated with isolated tumor cell pattern metastases in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade I endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Pelletier MP; Trinh VQ; Stephenson P; Mes-Masson AM; Samouelian V; Provencher DM; Rahimi K
Hum Pathol; 2017 Apr; 62():33-39. PubMed ID: 27864117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High frequency microsatellite instability has a prognostic value in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, but only in FIGO stage 1 cases.
Steinbakk A; Malpica A; Slewa A; Gudlaugsson E; Janssen EA; Arends M; Kruse AJ; Yinhua Y; Feng W; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2010; 33(5):245-55. PubMed ID: 21079294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redefining stage I endometrial cancer: incorporating histology, a binary grading system, myometrial invasion, and lymph node assessment.
Barlin JN; Soslow RA; Lutz M; Zhou QC; St Clair CM; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Hensley ML; Barakat RR; Matias-Guiu X; Abu-Rustum NR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1620-8. PubMed ID: 24126219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relevance of Molecular Profiling in Patients With Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer.
Vrede SW; Kasius J; Bulten J; Teerenstra S; Huvila J; Colas E; Gil-Moreno A; Boll D; Vos MC; van Altena AM; Asberger J; Sweegers S; van Weelden WJ; van der Putten LJM; Amant F; Visser NCM; Snijders MPLM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Kruitwagen R; Matias-Guiu X; Weinberger V; Reijnen C; Pijnenborg JMA
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Dec; 5(12):e2247372. PubMed ID: 36525269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of grading systems for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and their relation with pathologic prognostic parameters.
Kapucuoglu N; Bulbul D; Tulunay G; Temel MA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):790-6. PubMed ID: 17892460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polymerase ɛ (POLE) mutations in endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and implications for Lynch syndrome testing.
Billingsley CC; Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Stephens JA; Suarez AA; Goodfellow PJ
Cancer; 2015 Feb; 121(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 25224212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic value of nuclear grading and the revised FIGO grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Ayhan A; Taskiran C; Yuce K; Kucukali T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jan; 22(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 12496701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Architectural versus nuclear atypia-defined FIGO grade 2 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEC): a clinicopathologic comparison of 154 cases with clinical follow-up.
Winham WM; Lin D; Stone PJ; Nucci MR; Quick CM
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Mar; 33(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 24487465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular markers in recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancers.
Moroney MR; Davies KD; Wilberger AC; Sheeder J; Post MD; Berning AA; Fisher C; Lefkowits C; Guntupalli SR; Behbakht K; Corr BR
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):517-520. PubMed ID: 30910249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
