171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37268134)
1. In silico prediction of acute chemical toxicity of biocides in marine crustaceans using machine learning.
Krishnan R; Howard IS; Comber S; Jha AN
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Aug; 887():164072. PubMed ID: 37268134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QSAR modeling of Daphnia magna and fish toxicities of biocides using 2D descriptors.
Khan K; Khan PM; Lavado G; Valsecchi C; Pasqualini J; Baderna D; Marzo M; Lombardo A; Roy K; Benfenati E
Chemosphere; 2019 Aug; 229():8-17. PubMed ID: 31063877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. QSAR models for biocides: The example of the prediction of
Marzo M; Lavado GJ; Como F; Toropova AP; Toropov AA; Baderna D; Cappelli C; Lombardo A; Toma C; Blázquez M; Benfenati E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 31(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 31941347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical characterization and classification of colon microarray gene expression data using multiple machine learning paradigms.
Maniruzzaman M; Jahanur Rahman M; Ahammed B; Abedin MM; Suri HS; Biswas M; El-Baz A; Bangeas P; Tsoulfas G; Suri JS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():173-193. PubMed ID: 31200905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis.
Lin YT; Chu CY; Hung KS; Lu CH; Bednarczyk EM; Chen HY
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107028. PubMed ID: 35930862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models.
Rau CS; Kuo PJ; Chien PC; Huang CY; Hsieh HY; Hsieh CH
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207192. PubMed ID: 30412613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and internal validation of a machine-learning-developed model for predicting 1-year mortality after fragility hip fracture.
Kitcharanant N; Chotiyarnwong P; Tanphiriyakun T; Vanitcharoenkul E; Mahaisavariya C; Boonyaprapa W; Unnanuntana A
BMC Geriatr; 2022 May; 22(1):451. PubMed ID: 35610589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Liu L; Yang H; Cai Y; Cao Q; Sun L; Wang Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
Toxicol Res (Camb); 2019 May; 8(3):341-352. PubMed ID: 31160968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Chronic Lower Back Pain in People Aged over 50 Years.
Shim JG; Ryu KH; Cho EA; Ahn JH; Kim HK; Lee YJ; Lee SH
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 34833448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning algorithms to predict seizure due to acute tramadol poisoning.
Behnoush B; Bazmi E; Nazari SH; Khodakarim S; Looha MA; Soori H
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 40(8):1225-1233. PubMed ID: 33538187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecotoxicological QSAR modelling of the acute toxicity of fused and non-fused polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (FNFPAHs) against two aquatic organisms: Consensus modelling and comparison with ECOSAR.
Li F; Sun G; Fan T; Zhang N; Zhao L; Zhong R; Peng Y
Aquat Toxicol; 2023 Feb; 255():106393. PubMed ID: 36621240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Fan D; Yang H; Li F; Sun L; Di P; Li W; Tang Y; Liu G
Toxicol Res (Camb); 2018 Mar; 7(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 30090576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. Part 17: Development of Quantitative and Qualitative Prediction Models for Chemical-Induced Respiratory Toxicity.
Lei T; Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Kang Y; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
Mol Pharm; 2017 Jul; 14(7):2407-2421. PubMed ID: 28595388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning-based monosaccharide profiling for tissue-specific classification of Wolfiporia extensa samples.
Hsiung SY; Deng SX; Li J; Huang SY; Liaw CK; Huang SY; Wang CC; Hsieh YSY
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Dec; 322():121338. PubMed ID: 37839831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning outperformed logistic regression classification even with limit sample size: A model to predict pediatric HIV mortality and clinical progression to AIDS.
Domínguez-Rodríguez S; Serna-Pascual M; Oletto A; Barnabas S; Zuidewind P; Dobbels E; Danaviah S; Behuhuma O; Lain MG; Vaz P; Fernández-Luis S; Nhampossa T; Lopez-Varela E; Otwombe K; Liberty A; Violari A; Maiga AI; Rossi P; Giaquinto C; Kuhn L; Rojo P; Tagarro A;
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276116. PubMed ID: 36240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning-based models to predict aquatic ecological risk for engineered nanoparticles: using hazard concentration for 5% of species as an endpoint.
Qi Q; Wang Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(17):25114-25128. PubMed ID: 38467999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing in vivo data and in silico predictions for acute effects assessment of biocidal active substances and metabolites for aquatic organisms.
Blázquez M; Andreu-Sánchez O; Ranero I; Fernández-Cruz ML; Benfenati E
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Dec; 205():111291. PubMed ID: 32956865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QSAR modelling study of the bioconcentration factor and toxicity of organic compounds to aquatic organisms using machine learning and ensemble methods.
Ai H; Wu X; Zhang L; Qi M; Zhao Y; Zhao Q; Zhao J; Liu H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Sep; 179():71-78. PubMed ID: 31026752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting Chemical Carcinogens Using a Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method.
Limbu S; Dakshanamurthy S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
