These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37268134)

  • 21. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
    Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Machine-learning models for predicting surgical site infections using patient pre-operative risk and surgical procedure factors.
    Mamlook REA; Wells LJ; Sawyer R
    Am J Infect Control; 2023 May; 51(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 36002080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
    Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In silico prediction of drug-induced developmental toxicity by using machine learning approaches.
    Zhang H; Mao J; Qi HZ; Ding L
    Mol Divers; 2020 Nov; 24(4):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 31486961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Machine learning-driven QSAR models for predicting the mixture toxicity of nanoparticles.
    Zhang F; Wang Z; Peijnenburg WJGM; Vijver MG
    Environ Int; 2023 Jul; 177():108025. PubMed ID: 37329761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toxicity prediction of nanoparticles using machine learning approaches.
    Ahmadi M; Ayyoubzadeh SM; Ghorbani-Bidkorpeh F
    Toxicology; 2024 Jan; 501():153697. PubMed ID: 38056590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of a developed triple-classification machine learning model for carcinogenic prediction of hazardous organic chemicals to the US, EU, and WHO based on Chinese database.
    Hao N; Sun P; Zhao W; Li X
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Apr; 255():114806. PubMed ID: 36948010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In silico prediction of chemical acute oral toxicity using multi-classification methods.
    Li X; Chen L; Cheng F; Wu Z; Bian H; Xu C; Li W; Liu G; Shen X; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Apr; 54(4):1061-9. PubMed ID: 24735213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting acute aquatic toxicity of structurally diverse chemicals in fish using artificial intelligence approaches.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Rai P
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2013 Sep; 95():221-33. PubMed ID: 23764236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting Dose-Range Chemical Toxicity using Novel Hybrid Deep Machine-Learning Method.
    Limbu S; Zakka C; Dakshanamurthy S
    Toxics; 2022 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36422913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robust machine learning algorithms for predicting coastal water quality index.
    Uddin MG; Nash S; Mahammad Diganta MT; Rahman A; Olbert AI
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 321():115923. PubMed ID: 35988401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and validation of explainable machine-learning models for carotid atherosclerosis early screening.
    Yun K; He T; Zhen S; Quan M; Yang X; Man D; Zhang S; Wang W; Han X
    J Transl Med; 2023 May; 21(1):353. PubMed ID: 37246225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.
    Tang J; Wang X; Wan H; Lin C; Shao Z; Chang Y; Wang H; Wu Y; Zhang T; Du Y
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Oct; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 36284327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Machine learning-enabled predictive modeling to precisely identify the antimicrobial peptides.
    Wani MA; Garg P; Roy KK
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Nov; 59(11-12):2397-2408. PubMed ID: 34632545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mapping the spatial distribution of the dengue vector
    Rahman MS; Pientong C; Zafar S; Ekalaksananan T; Paul RE; Haque U; Rocklöv J; Overgaard HJ
    One Health; 2021 Dec; 13():100358. PubMed ID: 34934797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting metastasis in gastric cancer patients: machine learning-based approaches.
    Talebi A; Celis-Morales CA; Borumandnia N; Abbasi S; Pourhoseingholi MA; Akbari A; Yousefi J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4163. PubMed ID: 36914697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of models for predicting the changes in phytoplankton community composition in the receiving water system of an inter-basin water transfer project.
    Zeng Q; Liu Y; Zhao H; Sun M; Li X
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Apr; 223():676-684. PubMed ID: 28196722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches.
    Lei T; Sun H; Kang Y; Zhu F; Liu H; Zhou W; Wang Z; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):3935-3953. PubMed ID: 29037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of machine learning approaches for osteoporosis risk prediction in postmenopausal women.
    Shim JG; Kim DW; Ryu KH; Cho EA; Ahn JH; Kim JI; Lee SH
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Oct; 15(1):169. PubMed ID: 33097976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.