These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3726836)

  • 1. [Mass screening of cervical cancer in Ostfold 1959-77. An analysis based on the follow -up study completed December 31, 1982].
    Magnus K; Langmark F; Andersen A; Skjerven JE
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 May; 106(13):1088-94. PubMed ID: 3726836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytological mass screening in Ostfold County, Norway.
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):87-90. PubMed ID: 3570418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of cervical cancer subsequent to a positive screening cytology: follow-up study in Finland.
    Viikki M; Pukkala E; Hakama M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 10929958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inner-city breast and cervical cancer screening: a cooperative report.
    Ghazal M; Tetu-Mouradjian LM; Jones A; Block SH
    R I Med; 1993 Apr; 76(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 8513183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical and oral cancer screening in India.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Dinshaw K; Nene BM; Ramadas K; Esmy PO; Jayant K; Somanathan T; Shastri S
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S35-8. PubMed ID: 17227640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of cervical cancer in a women's prison.
    Audet-Lapointe P
    Can Med Assoc J; 1971 Mar; 104(6):509-11. PubMed ID: 5549991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participation in cervical cancer screening by age and region--a cohort study with a 3 1/2 year follow-up on 2,223,135 women in Bavaria.
    Rückinger S; Tauscher M; Redel R; Munte A; Walchner-Bonjean M; Hess J; Schneider A; von Kries R
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e17-21. PubMed ID: 18661453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
    Day NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Ostfold County, Norway.
    Pedersen E; Hoeg K; Kolstad P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1971; 50(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 5558600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bleeding symptoms and subsequent risk of gynecological and other cancers.
    Viikki M; Pukkala E; Hakama M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 May; 77(5):564-9. PubMed ID: 9654181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.
    Aklimunnessa K; Mori M; Khan MM; Sakauchi F; Kubo T; Fujino Y; Suzuki S; Tokudome S; Tamakoshi A; ; Motohashi Y; Tsuji I; Nakamura Y; Iso H; Mikami H; Inaba Y; Hoshiyama Y; Suzuki H; Shimizu H; Toyoshima H; Wakai K; Ito Y; Hashimoto S; Kikuchi S; Koizumi A; Kawamura T; Watanabe Y; Miki T; Date C; Sakata K; Nose T; Hayakawa N; Yoshimura T; Shibata A; Okamoto N; Shino H; Ohno Y; Kitagawa T; Kuroki T; Tajima K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 36(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 16844732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Ostfold County, Norway: an experiment. Second report of the Norwegian Cancer Society.
    Pedersen E; Hoeg K; Kolstad P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1971; ():Suppl 11:1-18. PubMed ID: 5285978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical cancer screening for high risk women: is it possible? Results of a cervical cancer screening program in three suburban districts of Lyon].
    Mignotte H; Perol D; Fontanière B; Nachury LP; Blanc-Jouvand A; Fouillat V; Chauvin F; Lasset C
    Bull Cancer; 1999 Jun; 86(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 10417430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carcinoma of the cervix in a country district.
    Tennent RB; Tennent MS; Philip NA
    N Z Med J; 1967 Mar; 66(415):Suppl:7-13. PubMed ID: 5228790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.