139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37268563)
1. Application of single-step single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model with unknown-parent groups for type traits in Japanese Holsteins.
Osawa T; Masuda Y; Saburi J; Hirumachi K
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4847-4859. PubMed ID: 37268563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DA; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5814-21. PubMed ID: 24997668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a single-step with a multistep single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model for genomic evaluation of conformation traits in German Holsteins.
Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Segelke D; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Apr; 105(4):3306-3322. PubMed ID: 35181130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3332-5. PubMed ID: 23477821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins.
Baba T; Gotoh Y; Yamaguchi S; Nakagawa S; Abe H; Masuda Y; Kawahara T
Anim Sci J; 2017 Aug; 88(8):1226-1231. PubMed ID: 27925408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling missing pedigree with metafounders and validating single-step genomic predictions in a small dairy cattle population with a great influence of foreign genetics.
López-Correa RD; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jul; 107(7):4685-4692. PubMed ID: 38310956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic evaluation of carcass traits of Korean beef cattle Hanwoo using a single-step marker effect model.
Koo Y; Alkhoder H; Choi TJ; Liu Z; Reents R
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37004242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
