These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37268883)

  • 1. A method for partitioning trends in genetic mean and variance to understand breeding practices.
    Oliveira TP; Obšteter J; Pocrnic I; Heslot N; Gorjanc G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):36. PubMed ID: 37268883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AlphaPart-R implementation of the method for partitioning genetic trends.
    Obšteter J; Holl J; Hickey JM; Gorjanc G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Mar; 53(1):30. PubMed ID: 33736590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal and genomic analysis of additive genetic variance in breeding programmes.
    Lara LAC; Pocrnic I; Oliveira TP; Gaynor RC; Gorjanc G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jan; 128(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 34912044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic Gain Increases by Applying the Usefulness Criterion with Improved Variance Prediction in Selection of Crosses.
    Lehermeier C; Teyssèdre S; Schön CC
    Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1651-1661. PubMed ID: 29038144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
    Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo - bridging the gap to high-performance Bayesian computation in animal breeding and genetics.
    Wu XL; Sun C; Beissinger TM; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Gatti Nde L; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Sep; 44(1):29. PubMed ID: 23009363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Nov; 53(1):89. PubMed ID: 34837954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Pareto principle in genome-wide breeding value estimation.
    Yu X; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Nov; 43(1):35. PubMed ID: 22044555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic and environmental heterogeneity of residual variance of weight traits in Nellore beef cattle.
    Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; Queiroz SA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):19. PubMed ID: 22672564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating variance components and breeding values for number of oocytes and number of embryos in dairy cattle using a single-step genomic evaluation.
    Cornelissen MAMC; Mullaart E; Van der Linde C; Mulder HA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jun; 100(6):4698-4705. PubMed ID: 28365120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Aamand GP; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):956. PubMed ID: 31818251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.
    Wang L; Janss LL; Madsen P; Henshall J; Huang CH; Marois D; Alemu S; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jun; 52(1):31. PubMed ID: 32527317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of sub-setting the data of the main Limousin beef cattle population on the estimates of across-country genetic correlations.
    Bonifazi R; Vandenplas J; Napel JT; Matilainen K; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jun; 52(1):32. PubMed ID: 32576143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations.
    Gorjanc G; Bijma P; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Aug; 47(1):65. PubMed ID: 26271246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review.
    Bouquet A; Juga J
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):705-13. PubMed ID: 23200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimising multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes including genomic selection using decorrelated or optimum selection indices.
    Börner V; Reinsch N
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):1. PubMed ID: 22252172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining genomic and genealogical information in a reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression model for genome-enabled predictions in dairy cattle.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; García-Cortés LA; González-Recio O
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e93424. PubMed ID: 24671175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.