BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37269798)

  • 1. Repair and tolerance of DNA damage at the replication fork: A structural perspective.
    Eichman BF
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2023 Aug; 81():102618. PubMed ID: 37269798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lesion Bypass and the Reactivation of Stalled Replication Forks.
    Marians KJ
    Annu Rev Biochem; 2018 Jun; 87():217-238. PubMed ID: 29298091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.
    Thakur RS; Basavaraju S; Khanduja JS; Muniyappa K; Nagaraju G
    J Biol Chem; 2015 Oct; 290(40):24119-39. PubMed ID: 26276393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.
    Cortez D
    Mol Cell; 2019 Jun; 74(5):866-876. PubMed ID: 31173722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.
    Kondratick CM; Washington MT; Spies M
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2021 May; 113():27-37. PubMed ID: 33967572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
    Jones RM; Petermann E
    Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):994-1003. PubMed ID: 17382606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.
    Joseph SA; Taglialatela A; Leuzzi G; Huang JW; Cuella-Martin R; Ciccia A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2020 Nov; 95():102943. PubMed ID: 32971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.
    Lambert S; Carr AM
    Chromosoma; 2013 Mar; 122(1-2):33-45. PubMed ID: 23446515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.
    Cortez D
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():149-157. PubMed ID: 25957489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Template-switching during replication fork repair in bacteria.
    Lovett ST
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2017 Aug; 56():118-128. PubMed ID: 28641943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks.
    Krishnamoorthy A; Jackson J; Mohamed T; Adolph M; Vindigni A; Cortez D
    Mol Cell; 2021 Jul; 81(14):3007-3017.e5. PubMed ID: 34107305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.
    Atkinson J; McGlynn P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jun; 37(11):3475-92. PubMed ID: 19406929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replisome structure suggests mechanism for continuous fork progression and post-replication repair.
    Yang W; Seidman MM; Rupp WD; Gao Y
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102658. PubMed ID: 31303546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulation of replication fork speed: Mechanisms and impact on genomic stability.
    Merchut-Maya JM; Bartek J; Maya-Mendoza A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Sep; 81():102654. PubMed ID: 31320249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms of damage tolerance and repair during DNA replication.
    Ashour ME; Mosammaparast N
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Apr; 49(6):3033-3047. PubMed ID: 33693881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2010 Mar; 11(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 20177396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The roles of DNA polymerase ΞΆ and the Y family DNA polymerases in promoting or preventing genome instability.
    Sharma S; Helchowski CM; Canman CE
    Mutat Res; 2013; 743-744():97-110. PubMed ID: 23195997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork.
    Paulsen RD; Cimprich KA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):953-66. PubMed ID: 17531546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of ubiquitination and the maintenance of replication fork stability in cancer therapy.
    Xia D; Zhu X; Wang Y; Gong P; Su HS; Xu X
    Biosci Rep; 2023 Oct; 43(10):. PubMed ID: 37728310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.