These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37269929)

  • 21. Effect of subclinical depression on moral judgment dilemmas: a process dissociation approach.
    Yin X; Hong Z; Zheng Y; Ni Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20065. PubMed ID: 36414675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment.
    Kahane G; Wiech K; Shackel N; Farias M; Savulescu J; Tracey I
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 7(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 21421730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.
    McCormick C; Rosenthal CR; Miller TD; Maguire EA
    J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(48):12157-12167. PubMed ID: 27903725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is Utilitarianism Risky? How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices.
    Lucas BJ; Galinsky AD
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jul; 10(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 26177954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.
    Paxton JM; Bruni T; Greene JD
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1368-71. PubMed ID: 23887818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contingencies of self-worth and the strength of deontological and utilitarian inclinations.
    Macko A
    J Soc Psychol; 2021 Nov; 161(6):664-682. PubMed ID: 33357143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Counter-intuitive moral judgement following traumatic brain injury.
    Rowley DA; Rogish M; Alexander T; Riggs KJ
    J Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 12(2):200-215. PubMed ID: 28168820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are thoughtful people more utilitarian? CRT as a unique predictor of moral minimalism in the dilemmatic context.
    Royzman EB; Landy JF; Leeman RF
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Mar; 39(2):325-52. PubMed ID: 24976510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcome-focused judgements of moral dilemmas in schizophrenia.
    McGuire J; Brüne M; Langdon R
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jul; 52():21-31. PubMed ID: 28454059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.
    Bartels DM; Pizarro DA
    Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):154-61. PubMed ID: 21757191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.
    Migliore S; D'Aurizio G; Parisi F; Maffi S; Squitieri B; Curcio G; Mancini F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 30025498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increased levels of autistic traits are associated with atypical moral judgments.
    Clarkson E; Jasper JD; Rose JP; Gaeth GJ; Levin IP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 May; 235():103895. PubMed ID: 36958201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do People Believe That They Are More Deontological Than Others?
    Li MH; Rao LL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1308-1320. PubMed ID: 30698496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incidental emotions in moral dilemmas: the influence of emotion regulation.
    Szekely RD; Miu AC
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 24611625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with differences in moral judgment.
    Bernhard RM; Chaponis J; Siburian R; Gallagher P; Ransohoff K; Wikler D; Perlis RH; Greene JD
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1872-1881. PubMed ID: 27497314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures.
    Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104910. PubMed ID: 34678683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective impairment of cognitive empathy for moral judgment in adults with high functioning autism.
    Gleichgerrcht E; Torralva T; Rattazzi A; Marenco V; Roca M; Manes F
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 8(7):780-8. PubMed ID: 22689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Drunk Utilitarian Revisited: Does Alcohol Really Increase Utilitarianism in Moral Judgment?
    Paruzel-Czachura M; Pypno K; Everett JAC; Białek M; Gawronski B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jan; 49(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 34657500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Moral dilemmas and moral principles: when emotion and cognition unite.
    Manfrinati A; Lotto L; Sarlo M; Palomba D; Rumiati R
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(7):1276-91. PubMed ID: 23614361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
    Reynolds CJ; Conway P
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1009-1023. PubMed ID: 29389202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.