These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37269929)

  • 41. Making utilitarian choices but giving deontological advice.
    Polman E; Ruttan RL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 35191727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selective changes in moral judgment by noninvasive brain stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex.
    Riva P; Manfrinati A; Sacchi S; Pisoni A; Romero Lauro LJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 30411201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.
    Bago B; De Neys W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1782-1801. PubMed ID: 30550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Hot utilitarianism and cold deontology: Insights from a response patterns approach to sacrificial and real world dilemmas.
    Rosas A; Viciana H; Caviedes E; Arciniegas A
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 14(2):125-135. PubMed ID: 29667482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Once a Utilitarian, Consistently a Utilitarian? Examining Principledness in Moral Judgment via the Robustness of Individual Differences.
    Helzer EG; Fleeson W; Furr RM; Meindl P; Barranti M
    J Pers; 2017 Aug; 85(4):505-517. PubMed ID: 27037484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A dose of ruthlessness: interpersonal moral judgment is hardened by the anti-anxiety drug lorazepam.
    Perkins AM; Leonard AM; Weaver K; Dalton JA; Mehta MA; Kumari V; Williams SC; Ettinger U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 23025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model.
    Luke DM; Gawronski B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 33615911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
    Kahane G; Everett JA; Earp BD; Farias M; Savulescu J
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():193-209. PubMed ID: 25460392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents.
    Capraro V; Sippel J
    Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 28597324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gender-related differences in moral judgments.
    Fumagalli M; Ferrucci R; Mameli F; Marceglia S; Mrakic-Sposta S; Zago S; Lucchiari C; Consonni D; Nordio F; Pravettoni G; Cappa S; Priori A
    Cogn Process; 2010 Aug; 11(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19727878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validation of the Korean version of the Moral Judgment Scale: A process dissociation approach to moral dilemmas.
    Jang E
    Heliyon; 2020 Nov; 6(11):e05518. PubMed ID: 33294671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Women smelling men's masked body odors show enhanced harm aversion in moral dilemmas.
    Cecchetto C; Lancini E; Rumiati RI; Parma V
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Mar; 201():212-220. PubMed ID: 30639588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Why People With High Alexithymia Make More Utilitarian Judgments.
    Zhang X; Wu Z; Li S; Lai J; Han M; Chen X; Liu C; Ding D
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 32520665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Harm aversion explains utilitarian choices in moral decision-making in males but not in females.
    Rota G; Palumbo S; Lattanzi N; Manfrinati A; Sarlo M; Lotto L; Pietrini P; Rumiati R; Pellegrini S
    Arch Ital Biol; 2016 Jun; 154(2-3):50-58. PubMed ID: 27918062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment.
    Cohen DJ; Ahn M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1359-1381. PubMed ID: 27513303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?
    Hannikainen IR; Machery E; Cushman FA
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():95-101. PubMed ID: 28963983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Testosterone and cortisol do not predict rejecting harm or maximizing outcomes in sacrificial moral dilemmas: A preregistered analysis.
    Reynolds CJ; Makhanova A; Nikonova L; Eckel LA; Conway P
    Horm Behav; 2021 Nov; 136():105063. PubMed ID: 34598057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Your morals depend on language.
    Costa A; Foucart A; Hayakawa S; Aparici M; Apesteguia J; Heafner J; Keysar B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94842. PubMed ID: 24760073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment.
    Côté S; Piff PK; Willer R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):490-503. PubMed ID: 23276265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A genetic profile of oxytocin receptor improves moral acceptability of outcome-maximizing harm in male insurance brokers.
    Palumbo S; Mariotti V; Anastasio T; Rota G; Lucchi L; Manfrinati A; Rumiati R; Lotto L; Sarlo M; Pietrini P; Pellegrini S
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Aug; 392():112681. PubMed ID: 32387223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.