BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37271051)

  • 1. Automatic detection of prostate cancer grades and chronic prostatitis in biparametric MRI.
    Bashkanov O; Rak M; Meyer A; Engelage L; Lumiani A; Muschter R; Hansen C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Sep; 239():107624. PubMed ID: 37271051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The value of machine learning models based on biparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer].
    Qiao XM; Hu CH; Hu S; Hu CH; Wang XM; Shen JK; Ji LB; Song Y; Bao J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 103(19):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 37198106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a validated prostate MRI deep learning system to independent same-vendor multi-institutional data: demonstration of transferability.
    Netzer N; Eith C; Bethge O; Hielscher T; Schwab C; Stenzinger A; Gnirs R; Schlemmer HP; Maier-Hein KH; Schimmöller L; Bonekamp D
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):7463-7476. PubMed ID: 37507610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep-Learning Models for Detection and Localization of Visible Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI.
    Sun Z; Wu P; Cui Y; Liu X; Wang K; Gao G; Wang H; Zhang X; Wang X
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Oct; 58(4):1067-1081. PubMed ID: 36825823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
    Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Cascaded Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automated Lesion Detection and Classification on Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Mehralivand S; Yang D; Harmon SA; Xu D; Xu Z; Roth H; Masoudi S; Sanford TH; Kesani D; Lay NS; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 34598869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wang B; Gao J; Zhang Q; Zhang C; Liu G; Wei W; Huang H; Fu Y; Li D; Zhang B; Guo H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Feb; 45(2):547-555. PubMed ID: 31907568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semi-automatic classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MR imaging using a multi-channel 3D convolutional neural network.
    Aldoj N; Lukas S; Dewey M; Penzkofer T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 31468158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion.
    Kim MJ; Park SY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 55(4):1226-1233. PubMed ID: 34296803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
    Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Stabile A; Giganti F; Kasivisvanathan V; Giannarini G; Moore CM; Padhani AR; Panebianco V; Rosenkrantz AB; Salomon G; Turkbey B; Villeirs G; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):145-167. PubMed ID: 32192942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer using a deep convolutional neural network from multiparametric MRI.
    Song Y; Zhang YD; Yan X; Liu H; Zhou M; Hu B; Yang G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1570-1577. PubMed ID: 29659067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
    Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Biparametric Prostate MRI, Radiomics, and Kallikreins: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Montoya Perez I; Merisaari H; Jambor I; Ettala O; Taimen P; Knaapila J; Kekki H; Khan FL; Syrjälä E; Steiner A; Syvänen KT; Verho J; Seppänen M; Rannikko A; Riikonen J; Mirtti T; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Falagario U; Martini A; Pahikkala T; Pettersson K; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):465-477. PubMed ID: 34227169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
    Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
    BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study.
    Cuocolo R; Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Romeo V; Verde F; Creta M; La Rocca R; Longo N; Pace L; Imbriaco M
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():144-149. PubMed ID: 31153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.