193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37271142)
1. .Signal Transparency of Remote Microphone Technology in Pediatric Bone Conduction Device Users.
Sanchez C; Morgenstein K; Snapp H
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):360-370. PubMed ID: 37271142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of performance in pediatric bone conduction implant recipients using remote microphone technology.
Snapp H; Morgenstein K; Sanchez C; Coto J; Cejas I
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 139():110444. PubMed ID: 33070059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Wesarg T; Stelzig Y; Hilgert-Becker D; Kathage B; Wiebe K; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Speck I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):246-256. PubMed ID: 31580804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Griffin AM; Atri A; Licameli G; Stiles DJ
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):588-602. PubMed ID: 36575571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful?
Kompis M; Kurz A; Pfiffner F; Senn P; Arnold A; Caversaccio M
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S47-50. PubMed ID: 24869443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing performance benefits of a programmable power baha® sound processor with a directional microphone for patients with a mixed hearing loss.
Flynn MC; Hedin A; Halvarsson G; Good T; Sadeghi A
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S76-81. PubMed ID: 22701154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features.
Curca IA; Parsa V; Macpherson EA; Scollie S; Vansevenant K; Zimmerman K; Lewis-Teeter J; Allen P; Parnes L; Agrawal S
Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):556-565. PubMed ID: 32069128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.
Chen J; Wang Z; Dong R; Fu X; Wang Y; Wang S
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():643205. PubMed ID: 33912004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing Benefit and Rated Satisfaction in Children with Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss Using a Transcutaneous Magnetic-Coupled Bone-Conduction Hearing Aid.
Polonenko MJ; Carinci L; Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Cushing SL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):790-804. PubMed ID: 27885975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of extended high frequency bandwidth in osseointegrated bone conduction device users.
Snapp HA; Kuzbyt B
Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108379. PubMed ID: 34756677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Performance With an Adaptive Digital Remote Microphone System and a Digital Remote Microphone Audio-Streaming Accessory System.
Wolfe J; Duke MM; Schafer E; Jones C; Mülder HE; John A; Hudson M
Am J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):440-50. PubMed ID: 26649548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
Thibodeau LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
