These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37272782)

  • 1. Ponderings on peer review: Part I. Basic principles.
    Seals DR
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2023 Aug; 325(2):R212-R226. PubMed ID: 37272782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ponderings on peer review: Part 3. Grant critiques.
    Seals DR
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2023 Nov; 325(5):R604-R618. PubMed ID: 37720995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ponderings on peer review. Part 2. Manuscript critiques.
    Seals DR
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2023 Oct; 325(4):R309-R326. PubMed ID: 37519254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publishing particulars: Part 3. General writing tips, editing, and responding to peer review.
    Seals DR
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2023 Mar; 324(3):R409-R424. PubMed ID: 36749293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publishing particulars: Part 1. The big picture.
    Seals DR
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2023 Mar; 324(3):R381-R392. PubMed ID: 36749295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talking the talk: tips for effective oral presentations in biomedical research.
    Seals DR
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2022 Oct; 323(4):R496-R511. PubMed ID: 36036453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts.
    Dhillon P
    FEBS J; 2021 May; 288(9):2750-2756. PubMed ID: 33486891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Peer Review Process.
    Willis LD
    Respir Care; 2024 Mar; 69(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 38538018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts.
    McDowell GS; Knutsen JD; Graham JM; Oelker SK; Lijek RS
    Elife; 2019 Oct; 8():. PubMed ID: 31668163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.
    Fowler EA; Bell K; Burns K; Chiazzese A; DeSerres SA; Foster BJ; Hartwig S; Herrington G; James MT; Jensen V; Jones N; Kidston S; Lemay S; Levin A; MacPhee A; McCutcheon S; Ravani P; Samuel S; Scholey J; Takano T; Tangri N; Verdin N; Alexander RT; Clase CM
    Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2022; 9():20543581221136402. PubMed ID: 36406869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The inaugural
    Adinortey CA; Dolan SK; Doore S; Lijek R; Pires DP; Yu W; Draganova EB; Schada von Borzyskowski L
    mBio; 2024 Jan; 15(1):e0199123. PubMed ID: 38099716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher.
    Henriquez T
    mBio; 2023 Oct; 14(5):e0194823. PubMed ID: 37811986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.
    Duncan GA; Lockett A; Villegas LR; Almodovar S; Gomez JL; Flores SC; Wilkes DS; Tigno XT
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Apr; 13(4):562-7. PubMed ID: 27058184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer Review.
    Wierzbinski-Cross H
    J Nurses Prof Dev; 2017; 33(2):102-104. PubMed ID: 28252494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tips and guidelines for being a good peer reviewer.
    Gisbert JP; Chaparro M
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Mar; 46(3):215-235. PubMed ID: 35278500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It's money! Real-world grant experience through a student-run, peer-reviewed program.
    Dumanis SB; Ullrich L; Washington PM; Forcelli PA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 24006391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A guide to the peer review of scientific papers].
    Giunta RE; Prommersberger KJ
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2012 Aug; 44(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 22836956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees.
    Seals DR; Tanaka H
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2000 Jun; 23(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10902527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.