161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37274777)
1. Personalized breast cancer screening with selective addition of digital breast tomosynthesis through artificial intelligence.
Dahlblom V; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Dustler M
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 2):S22408. PubMed ID: 37274777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence.
Dahlblom V; Dustler M; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3754-3765. PubMed ID: 36502459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial Intelligence Detection of Missed Cancers at Digital Mammography That Were Detected at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Dahlblom V; Andersson I; Lång K; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Dustler M
Radiol Artif Intell; 2021 Nov; 3(6):e200299. PubMed ID: 34870215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis in mammographic screening: false negative cancer cases in the To-Be 1 trial.
Moshina N; Gräwingholt A; Lång K; Mann R; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Skaane P; Lee CI; Aase HS; Aslaksen AB; Hofvind S
Insights Imaging; 2024 Feb; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 38332187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Is independent double reading still required?
Weigel S; Hense HW; Weyer-Elberich V; Gerss J; Heindel W
Rofo; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38295824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Olinder J; Rosso A; Andersson I; Lång K; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):8089-8099. PubMed ID: 37145147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36068450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics.
Regen-Tuero HC; Ram S; Gass JS; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 34523954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM
Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis: Impact on diagnostic performance, reading times, and workload in the era of personalized screening.
Magni V; Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Colarieti A; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110631. PubMed ID: 36481480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection enhances synthesized mammograms: comparison with original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in an experimental setting.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
Breast Cancer; 2023 Jan; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 36001270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
