These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37276124)

  • 1. Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020).
    Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):852-861. PubMed ID: 37276124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
    Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ignoring the unknown: Attentional suppression of unpredictable visual distraction.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36227324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Global enhancement of target color-not proactive suppression-explains attentional deployment during visual search.
    Oxner M; Martinovic J; Forschack N; Lempe R; Gundlach C; Müller M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1705-1722. PubMed ID: 37023328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual and Temporal Constraints for Attentional Capture: Commentary on Theeuwes' 2023 Review "The Attentional Capture Debate: When Can We Avoid Salient Distractors and when Not?".
    Noonan MP; Störmer VS
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):37. PubMed ID: 37426062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
    Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal expectations modulate attentional capture.
    Lamy D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 16615337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-blind attentional suppression of salient distractors.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1409-1424. PubMed ID: 37118222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Statistical Learning of a Salient Distractor's Color Implicit, Inflexible and Distinct From Inter-Trial Priming?
    Golan A; Lamy D
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):47. PubMed ID: 36349189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.
    Won BY; Forloines M; Zhou Z; Geng JJ
    Cortex; 2020 Nov; 132():309-321. PubMed ID: 33010740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Hauck C
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1958-1971. PubMed ID: 34561719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?
    Lamy D; Tsal Y; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):621-9. PubMed ID: 14620356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.
    Yashar A; White AL; Fang W; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2017 Aug; 17(9):7. PubMed ID: 28800369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.